[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <508b33f7-3dc0-4536-21f6-4a5e7ade2b5c@linux.dev>
Date: Mon, 9 Oct 2023 16:13:54 +0800
From: Yajun Deng <yajun.deng@...ux.dev>
To: Eric Dumazet <edumazet@...gle.com>
Cc: rostedt@...dmis.org, mhiramat@...nel.org, dennis@...nel.org,
tj@...nel.org, cl@...ux.com, mark.rutland@....com,
davem@...emloft.net, kuba@...nel.org, pabeni@...hat.com,
netdev@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Alexander Lobakin <aleksander.lobakin@...el.com>,
linux-trace-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-mm@...ck.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next v7] net/core: Introduce netdev_core_stats_inc()
On 2023/10/9 15:53, Eric Dumazet wrote:
> On Mon, Oct 9, 2023 at 5:07 AM Yajun Deng <yajun.deng@...ux.dev> wrote:
>
>> 'this_cpu_read + this_cpu_write' and 'pr_info + this_cpu_inc' will make
>> the trace work well.
>>
>> They all have 'pop' instructions in them. This may be the key to making
>> the trace work well.
>>
>> Hi all,
>>
>> I need your help on percpu and ftrace.
>>
> I do not think you made sure netdev_core_stats_inc() was never inlined.
>
> Adding more code in it is simply changing how the compiler decides to
> inline or not.
Yes, you are right. It needs to add the 'noinline' prefix. The
disassembly code will have 'pop'
instruction.
Thanks.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists