[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20231009083856.222030-2-u.kleine-koenig@pengutronix.de>
Date: Mon, 9 Oct 2023 10:38:37 +0200
From: Uwe Kleine-König
<u.kleine-koenig@...gutronix.de>
To: Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@...aro.org>
Cc: Maxime Coquelin <mcoquelin.stm32@...il.com>,
Alexandre Torgue <alexandre.torgue@...s.st.com>,
linux-gpio@...r.kernel.org,
linux-stm32@...md-mailman.stormreply.com,
linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: [PATCH 01/20] pinctrl: stmfx: Improve error message in .remove()'s error path
The driver core has no handling for errors returned by the .remove()
callback. The only action on error is a dev_warn() with generic error
message that the returned value is returned.
Replace it by a more specific and useful message. Then returning zero is
the right thing to do, the only effect is to suppress the core's
warning.
This prepares the driver for the conversion to .remove_new().
Signed-off-by: Uwe Kleine-König <u.kleine-koenig@...gutronix.de>
---
drivers/pinctrl/pinctrl-stmfx.c | 14 ++++++++++----
1 file changed, 10 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/pinctrl/pinctrl-stmfx.c b/drivers/pinctrl/pinctrl-stmfx.c
index 0974bbf57b54..d7ab82432a52 100644
--- a/drivers/pinctrl/pinctrl-stmfx.c
+++ b/drivers/pinctrl/pinctrl-stmfx.c
@@ -737,11 +737,17 @@ static int stmfx_pinctrl_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
static int stmfx_pinctrl_remove(struct platform_device *pdev)
{
struct stmfx *stmfx = dev_get_drvdata(pdev->dev.parent);
+ int ret;
- return stmfx_function_disable(stmfx,
- STMFX_FUNC_GPIO |
- STMFX_FUNC_ALTGPIO_LOW |
- STMFX_FUNC_ALTGPIO_HIGH);
+ ret = stmfx_function_disable(stmfx,
+ STMFX_FUNC_GPIO |
+ STMFX_FUNC_ALTGPIO_LOW |
+ STMFX_FUNC_ALTGPIO_HIGH);
+ if (ret)
+ dev_err(&pdev->dev, "Failed to disable pins (%pe)\n",
+ ERR_PTR(ret));
+
+ return 0;
}
#ifdef CONFIG_PM_SLEEP
--
2.40.1
Powered by blists - more mailing lists