[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20231009083856.222030-4-u.kleine-koenig@pengutronix.de>
Date: Mon, 9 Oct 2023 10:38:39 +0200
From: Uwe Kleine-König
<u.kleine-koenig@...gutronix.de>
To: Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@...aro.org>
Cc: Yangtao Li <frank.li@...o.com>,
Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@...ux.intel.com>,
linux-gpio@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: [PATCH 03/20] pinctrl: ti: ti-iodelay: Drop if block with always false condition
ti_iodelay_remove() is only called after ti_iodelay_probe() completed
successfully. In this case platform_set_drvdata() was called with a
non-NULL argument and so platform_get_drvdata() won't return NULL.
Simplify by removing the if block with the always false condition.
Signed-off-by: Uwe Kleine-König <u.kleine-koenig@...gutronix.de>
---
drivers/pinctrl/ti/pinctrl-ti-iodelay.c | 3 ---
1 file changed, 3 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/pinctrl/ti/pinctrl-ti-iodelay.c b/drivers/pinctrl/ti/pinctrl-ti-iodelay.c
index c1477f657839..f3a273562095 100644
--- a/drivers/pinctrl/ti/pinctrl-ti-iodelay.c
+++ b/drivers/pinctrl/ti/pinctrl-ti-iodelay.c
@@ -903,9 +903,6 @@ static int ti_iodelay_remove(struct platform_device *pdev)
{
struct ti_iodelay_device *iod = platform_get_drvdata(pdev);
- if (!iod)
- return 0;
-
if (iod->pctl)
pinctrl_unregister(iod->pctl);
--
2.40.1
Powered by blists - more mailing lists