[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20231009203324.4199996a@li-c0a070c6-1ab2-11ed-80f2-9c2dcd447373>
Date: Mon, 9 Oct 2023 20:33:24 +1100
From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@...hwell.id.au>
To: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>
Cc: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@...b.auug.org.au>,
Jens Axboe <axboe@...nel.dk>, Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Linux Next Mailing List <linux-next@...r.kernel.org>,
Sohil Mehta <sohil.mehta@...el.com>
Subject: Re: linux-next: manual merge of the block tree with the asm-generic
tree
Hi Peter,
On Mon, 9 Oct 2023 10:48:12 +0200 Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org> wrote:
>
> > #define __NR_fchmodat2 452
> > __SYSCALL(__NR_fchmodat2, sys_fchmodat2)
> > + #define __NR_futex_wake 454
> > + __SYSCALL(__NR_futex_wake, sys_futex_wake)
> > + #define __NR_futex_wait 455
> > + __SYSCALL(__NR_futex_wait, sys_futex_wait)
> > + #define __NR_futex_requeue 456
> > + __SYSCALL(__NR_futex_requeue, sys_futex_requeue)
> >
> > +#define __NR_map_shadow_stack 453
> > +__SYSCALL(__NR_map_shadow_stack, sys_map_shadow_stack)
> > +
> > #undef __NR_syscalls
> > - #define __NR_syscalls 454
> > + #define __NR_syscalls 457
> >
> > /*
> > * 32 bit systems traditionally used different
>
> This seems to have the hunks in the wrong order, 453 should come before
> 454 no?
Oops, fixed thanks.
--
Cheers,
Stephen Rothwell
Content of type "application/pgp-signature" skipped
Powered by blists - more mailing lists