[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <c15cb2ef-81b4-4a07-94a1-4312e7886f4b@samsung.com>
Date: Mon, 9 Oct 2023 12:02:58 +0200
From: Marek Szyprowski <m.szyprowski@...sung.com>
To: Mateusz Majewski <m.majewski2@...sung.com>,
linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org,
linux-samsung-soc@...r.kernel.org, linux-gpio@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Cc: Tomasz Figa <tomasz.figa@...il.com>,
Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski@...aro.org>,
Sylwester Nawrocki <s.nawrocki@...sung.com>,
Alim Akhtar <alim.akhtar@...sung.com>,
Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@...aro.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/4] Fix Samsung pinctrl driver static allocation of
GPIO base warning
On 06.10.2023 14:55, Mateusz Majewski wrote:
> The object of this work is fixing the following warning, which appears
> on all targets using that driver:
>
> gpio gpiochip0: Static allocation of GPIO base is deprecated, use dynamic allocation.
>
> This needs a small refactor to how we interact with the pinctrl
> subsystem. Finally, we remove some bookkeeping that has only been
> necessary to allocate GPIO bases correctly.
>
> Mateusz Majewski (4):
> pinctrl: samsung: defer pinctrl_enable
> pinctrl: samsung: use add_pin_ranges method to add pinctrl ranges
> pinctrl: samsung: choose GPIO numberspace base dynamically
> pinctrl: samsung: do not offset pinctrl numberspaces
>
> drivers/pinctrl/samsung/pinctrl-samsung.c | 56 ++++++++++++-----------
> drivers/pinctrl/samsung/pinctrl-samsung.h | 4 +-
> 2 files changed, 31 insertions(+), 29 deletions(-)
Just to let everyone know - I've tested this patchset on our test farm
and found no regressions on various Exynos based boards.
Tested-by: Marek Szyprowski <m.szyprowski@...sung.com>
Best regards
--
Marek Szyprowski, PhD
Samsung R&D Institute Poland
Powered by blists - more mailing lists