lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CANiq72mn3f1w0RZo58BrzDuDHjcGNyBr3FhygVGfSx_xbYwgLg@mail.gmail.com>
Date:   Mon, 9 Oct 2023 12:49:21 +0200
From:   Miguel Ojeda <miguel.ojeda.sandonis@...il.com>
To:     Trevor Gross <tmgross@...ch.edu>
Cc:     Martin Rodriguez Reboredo <yakoyoku@...il.com>,
        Miguel Ojeda <ojeda@...nel.org>,
        Alex Gaynor <alex.gaynor@...il.com>,
        Wedson Almeida Filho <wedsonaf@...il.com>,
        Boqun Feng <boqun.feng@...il.com>, Gary Guo <gary@...yguo.net>,
        Björn Roy Baron <bjorn3_gh@...tonmail.com>,
        Benno Lossin <benno.lossin@...ton.me>,
        Andreas Hindborg <a.hindborg@...sung.com>,
        Alice Ryhl <aliceryhl@...gle.com>,
        rust-for-linux@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
        FUJITA Tomonori <fujita.tomonori@...il.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] rust: macros: update 'paste!' macro to accept string literals

On Mon, Oct 9, 2023 at 5:04 AM Trevor Gross <tmgross@...ch.edu> wrote:
>
> Good point, thanks! I'll add that if there is a v2 (or Miguel can
> probably add it if not)

Yes, I add them myself when I notice they are missing (e.g. most
recently 2 of the ones in `rust-fixes`), but patches should definitely
come with the `Fixes: ` tag themselves, i.e. it should be the
exceptional case.

However, is this actually a fix? The title and commit message make it
sound like it is a new feature rather than a fix. And the docs of the
macro says literals are not supported, right?

So this probably needs to update those docs too (and ideally add an
example with the newly supported construct too). Or am I
misunderstanding?

Cheers,
Miguel

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ