[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <72e9f769-9cbb-274e-e99d-10c71f84bbe0@nvidia.com>
Date: Mon, 9 Oct 2023 17:06:40 +0530
From: Sumit Gupta <sumitg@...dia.com>
To: <rafael@...nel.org>, <viresh.kumar@...aro.org>,
<linux-pm@...r.kernel.org>, <linux-tegra@...r.kernel.org>,
<linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
CC: <treding@...dia.com>, <jonathanh@...dia.com>, <bbasu@...dia.com>,
<amiettinen@...dia.com>, Sumit Gupta <sumitg@...dia.com>
Subject: Re: [Patch v3 0/2] Improvements to the Tegra CPUFREQ driver
On 04/10/23 19:35, Sumit Gupta wrote:
> This patch set adds below improvements to the Tegra194 CPUFREQ driver.
> They are applicable to all the Tegra SoC's supported by the driver.
>
> 1) Patch 1: Avoid making SMP call on every frequency request to reduce
> the time for frequency set and get calls.
>
> 2) Patch 2: Use reference clock count based loop instead of udelay()
> to improve the accuracy of re-generated CPU frequency.
>
> The patches are not related but have minor conflict. So, need to be
> applied in order of patch numbers. If 'Patch 2' is to be applied first
> then will rebase that and send separately.
>
> ---
> v1[2] -> v3:
> - Patch 1: used sizeof(*data->cpu_data) in devm_kcalloc().
>
> v1[1] -> v2:
> - Patch 1: added new patch.
> - Patch 2: changed subject and patch order.
>
> Sumit Gupta (2):
> cpufreq: tegra194: save CPU data to avoid repeated SMP calls
> cpufreq: tegra194: use refclk delta based loop instead of udelay
>
> drivers/cpufreq/tegra194-cpufreq.c | 151 ++++++++++++++++++++---------
> 1 file changed, 106 insertions(+), 45 deletions(-)
>
> [2] https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/20230901164113.29139-1-sumitg@nvidia.com/
> [1] https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/20230901152046.25662-1-sumitg@nvidia.com/
>
Hi Viresh,
If there is no further comment.
Can we please still apply these patches for 6.7 ?
Best Regards,
Sumit Gupta
Powered by blists - more mailing lists