[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <ZSPnK8yi9mLdXwkl@gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 9 Oct 2023 13:42:35 +0200
From: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>
To: Uros Bizjak <ubizjak@...il.com>
Cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>, x86@...nel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, Andy Lutomirski <luto@...nel.org>,
Nadav Amit <namit@...are.com>, Brian Gerst <brgerst@...il.com>,
Denys Vlasenko <dvlasenk@...hat.com>,
"H . Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
Borislav Petkov <bp@...en8.de>,
Josh Poimboeuf <jpoimboe@...hat.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 4/4] x86/percpu: Use C for percpu read/write accessors
* Uros Bizjak <ubizjak@...il.com> wrote:
> I have tried the trick with all reads volatile (and writes as they were
> before the patch), but it didn't make a difference. Also, the kernel from
> the git/tip branch works OK for default config, so I think there is some
> config option that somehow disturbs the named-as enabled kernel.
Yeah, I made sure tip:x86/percpu boots & works fine on a number of systems
- but that testing wasn't comprehensive at all, and I didn't have KASAN
enabled either, which generates pretty intrusive instrumentation.
Thanks,
Ingo
Powered by blists - more mailing lists