| lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
|
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Message-ID: <169685459246.3135.11736895885500024488.tip-bot2@tip-bot2>
Date: Mon, 09 Oct 2023 12:29:52 -0000
From: "tip-bot2 for Thomas Gleixner" <tip-bot2@...utronix.de>
To: linux-tip-commits@...r.kernel.org
Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
"Borislav Petkov (AMD)" <bp@...en8.de>, x86@...nel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: [tip: x86/microcode] x86/microcode/intel: Unify microcode apply() functions
The following commit has been merged into the x86/microcode branch of tip:
Commit-ID: 1542922ce22a1da1a8b70b1d6e79cc92d229f061
Gitweb: https://git.kernel.org/tip/1542922ce22a1da1a8b70b1d6e79cc92d229f061
Author: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>
AuthorDate: Mon, 02 Oct 2023 13:59:46 +02:00
Committer: Borislav Petkov (AMD) <bp@...en8.de>
CommitterDate: Tue, 03 Oct 2023 16:03:40 +02:00
x86/microcode/intel: Unify microcode apply() functions
Deduplicate the early and late apply() functions.
[ bp: Rename the function which does the actual application to
__apply_microcode() to differentiate it from
microcode_ops.apply_microcode(). ]
Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>
Signed-off-by: Borislav Petkov (AMD) <bp@...en8.de>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20231002115902.625388847@linutronix.de
---
arch/x86/kernel/cpu/microcode/intel.c | 104 ++++++++-----------------
1 file changed, 36 insertions(+), 68 deletions(-)
diff --git a/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/microcode/intel.c b/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/microcode/intel.c
index f06889e..84d6edf 100644
--- a/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/microcode/intel.c
+++ b/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/microcode/intel.c
@@ -294,12 +294,12 @@ static __init struct microcode_intel *scan_microcode(void *data, size_t size,
return size ? NULL : patch;
}
-static enum ucode_state apply_microcode_early(struct ucode_cpu_info *uci)
+static enum ucode_state __apply_microcode(struct ucode_cpu_info *uci,
+ struct microcode_intel *mc,
+ u32 *cur_rev)
{
- struct microcode_intel *mc;
- u32 rev, old_rev, date;
+ u32 rev;
- mc = uci->mc;
if (!mc)
return UCODE_NFOUND;
@@ -308,14 +308,12 @@ static enum ucode_state apply_microcode_early(struct ucode_cpu_info *uci)
* operation - when the other hyperthread has updated the microcode
* already.
*/
- rev = intel_get_microcode_revision();
- if (rev >= mc->hdr.rev) {
- uci->cpu_sig.rev = rev;
+ *cur_rev = intel_get_microcode_revision();
+ if (*cur_rev >= mc->hdr.rev) {
+ uci->cpu_sig.rev = *cur_rev;
return UCODE_OK;
}
- old_rev = rev;
-
/*
* Writeback and invalidate caches before updating microcode to avoid
* internal issues depending on what the microcode is updating.
@@ -330,13 +328,24 @@ static enum ucode_state apply_microcode_early(struct ucode_cpu_info *uci)
return UCODE_ERROR;
uci->cpu_sig.rev = rev;
-
- date = mc->hdr.date;
- pr_info_once("updated early: 0x%x -> 0x%x, date = %04x-%02x-%02x\n",
- old_rev, rev, date & 0xffff, date >> 24, (date >> 16) & 0xff);
return UCODE_UPDATED;
}
+static enum ucode_state apply_microcode_early(struct ucode_cpu_info *uci)
+{
+ struct microcode_intel *mc = uci->mc;
+ enum ucode_state ret;
+ u32 cur_rev, date;
+
+ ret = __apply_microcode(uci, mc, &cur_rev);
+ if (ret == UCODE_UPDATED) {
+ date = mc->hdr.date;
+ pr_info_once("updated early: 0x%x -> 0x%x, date = %04x-%02x-%02x\n",
+ cur_rev, mc->hdr.rev, date & 0xffff, date >> 24, (date >> 16) & 0xff);
+ }
+ return ret;
+}
+
static __init bool load_builtin_intel_microcode(struct cpio_data *cp)
{
unsigned int eax = 1, ebx, ecx = 0, edx;
@@ -450,70 +459,29 @@ static int collect_cpu_info(int cpu_num, struct cpu_signature *csig)
return 0;
}
-static enum ucode_state apply_microcode_intel(int cpu)
+static enum ucode_state apply_microcode_late(int cpu)
{
struct ucode_cpu_info *uci = ucode_cpu_info + cpu;
- struct cpuinfo_x86 *c = &cpu_data(cpu);
- bool bsp = c->cpu_index == boot_cpu_data.cpu_index;
- struct microcode_intel *mc;
+ struct microcode_intel *mc = ucode_patch_late;
enum ucode_state ret;
- static int prev_rev;
- u32 rev;
+ u32 cur_rev;
- /* We should bind the task to the CPU */
- if (WARN_ON(raw_smp_processor_id() != cpu))
+ if (WARN_ON_ONCE(smp_processor_id() != cpu))
return UCODE_ERROR;
- mc = ucode_patch_late;
- if (!mc)
- return UCODE_NFOUND;
+ ret = __apply_microcode(uci, mc, &cur_rev);
+ if (ret != UCODE_UPDATED && ret != UCODE_OK)
+ return ret;
- /*
- * Save us the MSR write below - which is a particular expensive
- * operation - when the other hyperthread has updated the microcode
- * already.
- */
- rev = intel_get_microcode_revision();
- if (rev >= mc->hdr.rev) {
- ret = UCODE_OK;
- goto out;
- }
-
- /*
- * Writeback and invalidate caches before updating microcode to avoid
- * internal issues depending on what the microcode is updating.
- */
- native_wbinvd();
-
- /* write microcode via MSR 0x79 */
- wrmsrl(MSR_IA32_UCODE_WRITE, (unsigned long)mc->bits);
-
- rev = intel_get_microcode_revision();
-
- if (rev != mc->hdr.rev) {
- pr_err("CPU%d update to revision 0x%x failed\n",
- cpu, mc->hdr.rev);
- return UCODE_ERROR;
- }
-
- if (bsp && rev != prev_rev) {
- pr_info("updated to revision 0x%x, date = %04x-%02x-%02x\n",
- rev,
- mc->hdr.date & 0xffff,
- mc->hdr.date >> 24,
+ if (!cpu && uci->cpu_sig.rev != cur_rev) {
+ pr_info("Updated to revision 0x%x, date = %04x-%02x-%02x\n",
+ uci->cpu_sig.rev, mc->hdr.date & 0xffff, mc->hdr.date >> 24,
(mc->hdr.date >> 16) & 0xff);
- prev_rev = rev;
}
- ret = UCODE_UPDATED;
-
-out:
- uci->cpu_sig.rev = rev;
- c->microcode = rev;
-
- /* Update boot_cpu_data's revision too, if we're on the BSP: */
- if (bsp)
- boot_cpu_data.microcode = rev;
+ cpu_data(cpu).microcode = uci->cpu_sig.rev;
+ if (!cpu)
+ boot_cpu_data.microcode = uci->cpu_sig.rev;
return ret;
}
@@ -654,7 +622,7 @@ static void finalize_late_load(int result)
static struct microcode_ops microcode_intel_ops = {
.request_microcode_fw = request_microcode_fw,
.collect_cpu_info = collect_cpu_info,
- .apply_microcode = apply_microcode_intel,
+ .apply_microcode = apply_microcode_late,
.finalize_late_load = finalize_late_load,
};
Powered by blists - more mailing lists