linux-kernel - [tip: x86/microcode] x86/microcode/intel: Save the microcode only after a successful late-load

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <169685459342.3135.578180378589368912.tip-bot2@tip-bot2>
Date:   Mon, 09 Oct 2023 12:29:53 -0000
From:   "tip-bot2 for Thomas Gleixner" <tip-bot2@...utronix.de>
To:     linux-tip-commits@...r.kernel.org
Cc:     Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
        "Borislav Petkov (AMD)" <bp@...en8.de>, x86@...nel.org,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: [tip: x86/microcode] x86/microcode/intel: Save the microcode only
 after a successful late-load

The following commit has been merged into the x86/microcode branch of tip:

Commit-ID:     ed1a85d984ac1543349da617dce65f4190839f9f
Gitweb:        https://git.kernel.org/tip/ed1a85d984ac1543349da617dce65f4190839f9f
Author:        Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>
AuthorDate:    Mon, 02 Oct 2023 13:59:44 +02:00
Committer:     Borislav Petkov (AMD) <bp@...en8.de>
CommitterDate: Tue, 03 Oct 2023 15:58:25 +02:00

x86/microcode/intel: Save the microcode only after a successful late-load

There are situations where the late microcode is loaded into memory but
is not applied:

  1) The rendezvous fails
  2) The microcode is rejected by the CPUs

If any of this happens then the pointer which was updated at firmware
load time is stale and subsequent CPU hotplug operations either fail to
update or create inconsistent microcode state.

Save the loaded microcode in a separate pointer before the late load is
attempted and when successful, update the hotplug pointer accordingly
via a new microcode_ops callback.

Remove the pointless fallback in the loader to a microcode pointer which
is never populated.

Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>
Signed-off-by: Borislav Petkov (AMD) <bp@...en8.de>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20231002115902.505491309@linutronix.de
---
 arch/x86/kernel/cpu/microcode/core.c     |  4 +++-
 arch/x86/kernel/cpu/microcode/intel.c    | 30 +++++++++++------------
 arch/x86/kernel/cpu/microcode/internal.h |  1 +-
 3 files changed, 20 insertions(+), 15 deletions(-)

diff --git a/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/microcode/core.c b/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/microcode/core.c
index 5d8ac8b..0d99d5e 100644
--- a/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/microcode/core.c
+++ b/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/microcode/core.c
@@ -400,6 +400,10 @@ static int microcode_reload_late(void)
 	store_cpu_caps(&prev_info);
 
 	ret = stop_machine_cpuslocked(__reload_late, NULL, cpu_online_mask);
+
+	if (microcode_ops->finalize_late_load)
+		microcode_ops->finalize_late_load(ret);
+
 	if (!ret) {
 		pr_info("Reload succeeded, microcode revision: 0x%x -> 0x%x\n",
 			old, boot_cpu_data.microcode);
diff --git a/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/microcode/intel.c b/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/microcode/intel.c
index a80c019..2d88929 100644
--- a/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/microcode/intel.c
+++ b/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/microcode/intel.c
@@ -34,6 +34,7 @@ static const char ucode_path[] = "kernel/x86/microcode/GenuineIntel.bin";
 
 /* Current microcode patch used in early patching on the APs. */
 static struct microcode_intel *ucode_patch_va __read_mostly;
+static struct microcode_intel *ucode_patch_late __read_mostly;
 
 /* last level cache size per core */
 static unsigned int llc_size_per_core __ro_after_init;
@@ -461,12 +462,9 @@ static enum ucode_state apply_microcode_intel(int cpu)
 	if (WARN_ON(raw_smp_processor_id() != cpu))
 		return UCODE_ERROR;
 
-	mc = ucode_patch_va;
-	if (!mc) {
-		mc = uci->mc;
-		if (!mc)
-			return UCODE_NFOUND;
-	}
+	mc = ucode_patch_late;
+	if (!mc)
+		return UCODE_NFOUND;
 
 	/*
 	 * Save us the MSR write below - which is a particular expensive
@@ -585,15 +583,7 @@ static enum ucode_state parse_microcode_blobs(int cpu, struct iov_iter *iter)
 	if (!new_mc)
 		return UCODE_NFOUND;
 
-	/* Save for CPU hotplug */
-	save_microcode_patch((struct microcode_intel *)new_mc);
-	uci->mc = ucode_patch_va;
-
-	vfree(new_mc);
-
-	pr_debug("CPU%d found a matching microcode update with version 0x%x (current=0x%x)\n",
-		 cpu, cur_rev, uci->cpu_sig.rev);
-
+	ucode_patch_late = (struct microcode_intel *)new_mc;
 	return UCODE_NEW;
 }
 
@@ -650,10 +640,20 @@ static enum ucode_state request_microcode_fw(int cpu, struct device *device)
 	return ret;
 }
 
+static void finalize_late_load(int result)
+{
+	if (!result)
+		save_microcode_patch(ucode_patch_late);
+
+	vfree(ucode_patch_late);
+	ucode_patch_late = NULL;
+}
+
 static struct microcode_ops microcode_intel_ops = {
 	.request_microcode_fw	= request_microcode_fw,
 	.collect_cpu_info	= collect_cpu_info,
 	.apply_microcode	= apply_microcode_intel,
+	.finalize_late_load	= finalize_late_load,
 };
 
 static __init void calc_llc_size_per_core(struct cpuinfo_x86 *c)
diff --git a/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/microcode/internal.h b/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/microcode/internal.h
index 1033176..051b795 100644
--- a/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/microcode/internal.h
+++ b/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/microcode/internal.h
@@ -31,6 +31,7 @@ struct microcode_ops {
 	 */
 	enum ucode_state (*apply_microcode)(int cpu);
 	int (*collect_cpu_info)(int cpu, struct cpu_signature *csig);
+	void (*finalize_late_load)(int result);
 };
 
 extern struct ucode_cpu_info ucode_cpu_info[];