linux-kernel - [PATCH] selftests:modify the incorrect print format

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <20231009031624.4132-1-zhujun2@cmss.chinamobile.com>
Date:   Sun,  8 Oct 2023 20:16:24 -0700
From:   zhujun2 <zhujun2@...s.chinamobile.com>
To:     shuah@...nel.org
Cc:     nathan@...nel.org, ndesaulniers@...gle.com, trix@...hat.com,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, zhujun2@...s.chinamobile.com
Subject: [PATCH] selftests:modify the incorrect print format

printf %d in format string requires 'int' but the argument type is 'unsigned int'

Signed-off-by: zhujun2 <zhujun2@...s.chinamobile.com>
---
 tools/testing/selftests/kselftest.h | 14 +++++++-------
 1 file changed, 7 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-)

diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/kselftest.h b/tools/testing/selftests/kselftest.h
index 529d29a35..bec2fae58 100644
--- a/tools/testing/selftests/kselftest.h
+++ b/tools/testing/selftests/kselftest.h
@@ -129,7 +129,7 @@ static inline void ksft_print_header(void)
 static inline void ksft_set_plan(unsigned int plan)
 {
 	ksft_plan = plan;
-	printf("1..%d\n", ksft_plan);
+	printf("1..%u\n", ksft_plan);
 }
 
 static inline void ksft_print_cnts(void)
@@ -137,7 +137,7 @@ static inline void ksft_print_cnts(void)
 	if (ksft_plan != ksft_test_num())
 		printf("# Planned tests != run tests (%u != %u)\n",
 			ksft_plan, ksft_test_num());
-	printf("# Totals: pass:%d fail:%d xfail:%d xpass:%d skip:%d error:%d\n",
+	printf("# Totals: pass:%u fail:%u xfail:%u xpass:%u skip:%u error:%u\n",
 		ksft_cnt.ksft_pass, ksft_cnt.ksft_fail,
 		ksft_cnt.ksft_xfail, ksft_cnt.ksft_xpass,
 		ksft_cnt.ksft_xskip, ksft_cnt.ksft_error);
@@ -163,7 +163,7 @@ static inline void ksft_test_result_pass(const char *msg, ...)
 	ksft_cnt.ksft_pass++;
 
 	va_start(args, msg);
-	printf("ok %d ", ksft_test_num());
+	printf("ok %u ", ksft_test_num());
 	errno = saved_errno;
 	vprintf(msg, args);
 	va_end(args);
@@ -177,7 +177,7 @@ static inline void ksft_test_result_fail(const char *msg, ...)
 	ksft_cnt.ksft_fail++;
 
 	va_start(args, msg);
-	printf("not ok %d ", ksft_test_num());
+	printf("not ok %u ", ksft_test_num());
 	errno = saved_errno;
 	vprintf(msg, args);
 	va_end(args);
@@ -203,7 +203,7 @@ static inline void ksft_test_result_xfail(const char *msg, ...)
 	ksft_cnt.ksft_xfail++;
 
 	va_start(args, msg);
-	printf("ok %d # XFAIL ", ksft_test_num());
+	printf("ok %u # XFAIL ", ksft_test_num());
 	errno = saved_errno;
 	vprintf(msg, args);
 	va_end(args);
@@ -217,7 +217,7 @@ static inline void ksft_test_result_skip(const char *msg, ...)
 	ksft_cnt.ksft_xskip++;
 
 	va_start(args, msg);
-	printf("ok %d # SKIP ", ksft_test_num());
+	printf("ok %u # SKIP ", ksft_test_num());
 	errno = saved_errno;
 	vprintf(msg, args);
 	va_end(args);
@@ -232,7 +232,7 @@ static inline void ksft_test_result_error(const char *msg, ...)
 	ksft_cnt.ksft_error++;
 
 	va_start(args, msg);
-	printf("not ok %d # error ", ksft_test_num());
+	printf("not ok %u # error ", ksft_test_num());
 	errno = saved_errno;
 	vprintf(msg, args);
 	va_end(args);
-- 
2.17.1