lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:   Mon, 9 Oct 2023 15:27:50 +0200
From:   Daniel Borkmann <daniel@...earbox.net>
To:     Björn Töpel <bjorn@...nel.org>,
        Alexei Starovoitov <ast@...nel.org>,
        Andrii Nakryiko <andrii@...nel.org>, bpf@...r.kernel.org,
        netdev@...r.kernel.org, Pu Lehui <pulehui@...wei.com>
Cc:     Björn Töpel <bjorn@...osinc.com>,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, Luke Nelson <luke.r.nels@...il.com>,
        Xi Wang <xi.wang@...il.com>, linux-riscv@...ts.infradead.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH bpf 0/2] riscv, bpf: Properly sign-extend return values

On 10/4/23 2:07 PM, Björn Töpel wrote:
> From: Björn Töpel <bjorn@...osinc.com>
[...]
> The following test_progs now pass, which were previously broken:
> 
>    | 13      bpf_cookie
>    | 19      bpf_mod_race
>    | 68      deny_namespace
>    | 119     libbpf_get_fd_by_id_opts
>    | 135     lookup_key
>    | 137     lsm_cgroup
>    | 284     test_lsm

Thanks for the fixes, took them into bpf tree. I was wondering whether this could be
backed by specific tests, but looks like the above list already takes care of it.

Thanks,
Daniel

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ