[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <6dbba8a3-b07c-5247-f2c1-c6b484e9a16e@iogearbox.net>
Date: Mon, 9 Oct 2023 15:27:50 +0200
From: Daniel Borkmann <daniel@...earbox.net>
To: Björn Töpel <bjorn@...nel.org>,
Alexei Starovoitov <ast@...nel.org>,
Andrii Nakryiko <andrii@...nel.org>, bpf@...r.kernel.org,
netdev@...r.kernel.org, Pu Lehui <pulehui@...wei.com>
Cc: Björn Töpel <bjorn@...osinc.com>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, Luke Nelson <luke.r.nels@...il.com>,
Xi Wang <xi.wang@...il.com>, linux-riscv@...ts.infradead.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH bpf 0/2] riscv, bpf: Properly sign-extend return values
On 10/4/23 2:07 PM, Björn Töpel wrote:
> From: Björn Töpel <bjorn@...osinc.com>
[...]
> The following test_progs now pass, which were previously broken:
>
> | 13 bpf_cookie
> | 19 bpf_mod_race
> | 68 deny_namespace
> | 119 libbpf_get_fd_by_id_opts
> | 135 lookup_key
> | 137 lsm_cgroup
> | 284 test_lsm
Thanks for the fixes, took them into bpf tree. I was wondering whether this could be
backed by specific tests, but looks like the above list already takes care of it.
Thanks,
Daniel
Powered by blists - more mailing lists