linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] tee: make tee

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <CAFA6WYNbMsEE7OF0SpLN5gQx5-TNPXD7Zm+2tVu21xdpzKU=Xg@mail.gmail.com>
Date:   Mon, 9 Oct 2023 11:04:33 +0530
From:   Sumit Garg <sumit.garg@...aro.org>
To:     Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
Cc:     op-tee@...ts.trustedfirmware.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
        Jens Wiklander <jens.wiklander@...aro.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] tee: make tee_class constant

On Fri, 6 Oct 2023 at 19:30, Greg Kroah-Hartman
<gregkh@...uxfoundation.org> wrote:
>
> Now that the driver core allows for struct class to be in read-only
> memory, we should make all 'class' structures declared at build time
> placing them into read-only memory, instead of having to be dynamically
> allocated at runtime.
>
> Cc: Jens Wiklander <jens.wiklander@...aro.org>
> Cc: Sumit Garg <sumit.garg@...aro.org>
> Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
> ---
>  drivers/tee/tee_core.c | 21 +++++++++++----------
>  1 file changed, 11 insertions(+), 10 deletions(-)
>

Apart from nit below, feel free to add:

Reviewed-by: Sumit Garg <sumit.garg@...aro.org>

> diff --git a/drivers/tee/tee_core.c b/drivers/tee/tee_core.c
> index 0eb342de0b00..5ddfd5d9ac7f 100644
> --- a/drivers/tee/tee_core.c
> +++ b/drivers/tee/tee_core.c
> @@ -40,7 +40,10 @@ static const uuid_t tee_client_uuid_ns = UUID_INIT(0x58ac9ca0, 0x2086, 0x4683,
>  static DECLARE_BITMAP(dev_mask, TEE_NUM_DEVICES);
>  static DEFINE_SPINLOCK(driver_lock);
>
> -static struct class *tee_class;
> +static const struct class tee_class = {
> +       .name = "tee",
> +};
> +
>  static dev_t tee_devt;
>
>  struct tee_context *teedev_open(struct tee_device *teedev)
> @@ -919,7 +922,7 @@ struct tee_device *tee_device_alloc(const struct tee_desc *teedesc,
>                  teedesc->flags & TEE_DESC_PRIVILEGED ? "priv" : "",
>                  teedev->id - offs);
>
> -       teedev->dev.class = tee_class;
> +       teedev->dev.class = &tee_class;
>         teedev->dev.release = tee_release_device;
>         teedev->dev.parent = dev;
>
> @@ -1112,7 +1115,7 @@ tee_client_open_context(struct tee_context *start,
>                 dev = &start->teedev->dev;
>
>         do {
> -               dev = class_find_device(tee_class, dev, &match_data, match_dev);
> +               dev = class_find_device(&tee_class, dev, &match_data, match_dev);
>                 if (!dev) {
>                         ctx = ERR_PTR(-ENOENT);
>                         break;
> @@ -1226,10 +1229,10 @@ static int __init tee_init(void)
>  {
>         int rc;
>
> -       tee_class = class_create("tee");
> -       if (IS_ERR(tee_class)) {
> +       rc = class_register(&tee_class);
> +       if (rc) {
>                 pr_err("couldn't create class\n");

nit: this error message should be updated as well.

-Sumit

> -               return PTR_ERR(tee_class);
> +               return rc;
>         }
>
>         rc = alloc_chrdev_region(&tee_devt, 0, TEE_NUM_DEVICES, "tee");
> @@ -1249,8 +1252,7 @@ static int __init tee_init(void)
>  out_unreg_chrdev:
>         unregister_chrdev_region(tee_devt, TEE_NUM_DEVICES);
>  out_unreg_class:
> -       class_destroy(tee_class);
> -       tee_class = NULL;
> +       class_unregister(&tee_class);
>
>         return rc;
>  }
> @@ -1259,8 +1261,7 @@ static void __exit tee_exit(void)
>  {
>         bus_unregister(&tee_bus_type);
>         unregister_chrdev_region(tee_devt, TEE_NUM_DEVICES);
> -       class_destroy(tee_class);
> -       tee_class = NULL;
> +       class_unregister(&tee_class);
>  }
>
>  subsys_initcall(tee_init);
> --
> 2.42.0
>