[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date: Tue, 10 Oct 2023 16:12:44 +0200
From: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>
To: Phil Auld <pauld@...hat.com>
Cc: Chen Yu <yu.c.chen@...el.com>, Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>,
Juri Lelli <juri.lelli@...hat.com>,
Vincent Guittot <vincent.guittot@...aro.org>,
Biju Das <biju.das.jz@...renesas.com>,
Marek Szyprowski <m.szyprowski@...sung.com>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, Tim Chen <tim.c.chen@...el.com>,
Chen Yu <yu.chen.surf@...il.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] sched/fair: Use printk_deferred instead of printk in
pick_eevdf()
On Tue, Oct 10, 2023 at 08:26:00AM -0400, Phil Auld wrote:
> > No.. I detest printk_deferred with a passion. This is effectively a WARN
> > and we don't do silly buggers for them either.
> >
>
> Sure, printk_deferred is not ideal, but is getting this message in the right
> order worth locking up people's machines? Not sure you get the message at
> all when that happens. I have to dig the code location out of the crash
> dump to find which sched warning fired and took down the (usually virtual)
> machine.
Same thing with WARN(), we don't have a silly bugger version of that
either. Just use a sane printk() / console or whatever.
Virt stuff has perfectly functional serial consoles that works just fine
and don't lock up the machine -- mostly. Use my early_printk hacks if
you want something reliable:
https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/peterz/queue.git/log/?h=debug/experimental
Boot with: "earlyprintk=serial,ttyS0,115200 force_early_printk". And all
will be well.
The fact that crashdump is more reliable than printk is a *BIG* problem
and the only solution is fixing printk() (people are sorta working on
that). We should not try and work around this problem.
I fundamentally despise the delayed stuff, I've had countless insteances
where delaying output means you have no output because the machine is
dead.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists