linux-kernel - Re: linux-next: manual merge of the iommufd tree with the iommu tree

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Wed, 11 Oct 2023 10:58:32 -0300
From:   Jason Gunthorpe <jgg@...dia.com>
To:     Stephen Rothwell <sfr@...b.auug.org.au>
Cc:     Joerg Roedel <joro@...tes.org>, Joerg Roedel <jroedel@...e.de>,
        Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        Linux Next Mailing List <linux-next@...r.kernel.org>,
        Lu Baolu <baolu.lu@...ux.intel.com>,
        Nicolin Chen <nicolinc@...dia.com>, Yi Liu <yi.l.liu@...el.com>
Subject: Re: linux-next: manual merge of the iommufd tree with the iommu tree

On Wed, Oct 11, 2023 at 04:03:57PM +1100, Stephen Rothwell wrote:
> Hi all,
> 
> Today's linux-next merge of the iommufd tree got a conflict in:
> 
>   include/linux/iommu.h
> 
> between commit:
> 
>   4601cd2d7c4c ("iommu: Add ops->domain_alloc_paging()")
> 
> from the iommu tree and commit:
> 
>   909f4abd1097 ("iommu: Add new iommu op to create domains owned by userspace")
> 
> from the iommufd tree.
> 
> I fixed it up (see below) and can carry the fix as necessary. This
> is now fixed as far as linux-next is concerned, but any non trivial
> conflicts should be mentioned to your upstream maintainer when your tree
> is submitted for merging.  You may also want to consider cooperating
> with the maintainer of the conflicting tree to minimise any particularly
> complex conflicts.

Looks right, thanks

Jason