lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAHp75VeKw-dkc+7TjZLGpgQaBXx+-u_eADdJ9o3-PcCAKRdwLg@mail.gmail.com>
Date:   Wed, 11 Oct 2023 18:18:19 +0300
From:   Andy Shevchenko <andy.shevchenko@...il.com>
To:     Peter Rosin <peda@...ntia.se>
Cc:     Bartosz Golaszewski <brgl@...ev.pl>,
        Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@...aro.org>,
        Andy Shevchenko <andy@...nel.org>,
        Peter Korsgaard <peter.korsgaard@...co.com>,
        linux-gpio@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-i2c@...r.kernel.org,
        Bartosz Golaszewski <bartosz.golaszewski@...aro.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 3/3] i2c: mux: gpio: don't fiddle with GPIOLIB internals

On Wed, Oct 11, 2023 at 5:59 PM Peter Rosin <peda@...ntia.se> wrote:
> 2023-10-11 at 15:02, Bartosz Golaszewski wrote:

> > Use the relevant API functions to retrieve the address of the
> > underlying struct device instead of accessing GPIOLIB private structures
> > manually.

> Very nice to see that wart gone! The only small question I have
> is if these helpers are needed elsewhere, or if a more "direct"
> gpiod_to_device() would have been sufficient?

Same concern is here. But I'm fine with the code.

-- 
With Best Regards,
Andy Shevchenko

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ