[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <7e68377e780a2f4312a69ce8afda0cda8ad84568.camel@mediatek.com>
Date: Wed, 11 Oct 2023 02:49:44 +0000
From: Mark-PK Tsai (蔡沛剛)
<Mark-PK.Tsai@...iatek.com>
To: "linux@...linux.org.uk" <linux@...linux.org.uk>,
"matthias.bgg@...il.com" <matthias.bgg@...il.com>,
"angelogioacchino.delregno@...labora.com"
<angelogioacchino.delregno@...labora.com>
CC: "robin.murphy@....com" <robin.murphy@....com>,
"linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org"
<linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>,
"xuewen.yan@...soc.com" <xuewen.yan@...soc.com>,
"linux-mediatek@...ts.infradead.org"
<linux-mediatek@...ts.infradead.org>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
YJ Chiang (江英杰) <yj.chiang@...iatek.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] ARM: vfp: Add missing VFP instructions to
neon_support_hook
On Mon, 2023-09-25 at 21:17 +0800, Mark-PK Tsai wrote:
> Add the missing "Unconditional Advanced SIMD and floating-point
> instructions" in [1] to the VFP undef hook.
>
> This commit addresses the issue reported in [2], where
> executing the vudot instruction on a platform with FEAT_DotProd
> support resulted in an undefined instruction error.
>
> Link:
> https://developer.arm.com/documentation/ddi0597/2023-06/?lang=en [1]
> Link:
> https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/20230920083907.30479-1-mark-pk.tsai@mediatek.com/
> [2]
> Signed-off-by: Mark-PK Tsai <mark-pk.tsai@...iatek.com>
> ---
> arch/arm/vfp/vfpmodule.c | 18 ++++++++++++++++++
> 1 file changed, 18 insertions(+)
>
> diff --git a/arch/arm/vfp/vfpmodule.c b/arch/arm/vfp/vfpmodule.c
> index 7e8773a2d99d..b68efe643a12 100644
> --- a/arch/arm/vfp/vfpmodule.c
> +++ b/arch/arm/vfp/vfpmodule.c
> @@ -800,6 +800,24 @@ static struct undef_hook neon_support_hook[] =
> {{
> .cpsr_mask = PSR_T_BIT,
> .cpsr_val = PSR_T_BIT,
> .fn = vfp_support_entry,
> +}, {
> + .instr_mask = 0xff000800,
> + .instr_val = 0xfc000800,
> + .cpsr_mask = 0,
> + .cpsr_val = 0,
> + .fn = vfp_support_entry,
> +}, {
> + .instr_mask = 0xff000800,
> + .instr_val = 0xfd000800,
> + .cpsr_mask = 0,
> + .cpsr_val = 0,
> + .fn = vfp_support_entry,
> +}, {
> + .instr_mask = 0xff000800,
> + .instr_val = 0xfe000800,
> + .cpsr_mask = 0,
> + .cpsr_val = 0,
> + .fn = vfp_support_entry,
> }};
Could someone please kindly review this patch?
Thanks.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists