[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <fa03a5ca-fb16-47bb-a2c8-5cc4d96e54a9@amd.com>
Date: Wed, 11 Oct 2023 11:57:02 -0500
From: "Moger, Babu" <babu.moger@....com>
To: Reinette Chatre <reinette.chatre@...el.com>, corbet@....net,
tglx@...utronix.de, mingo@...hat.com, bp@...en8.de
Cc: fenghua.yu@...el.com, dave.hansen@...ux.intel.com, x86@...nel.org,
hpa@...or.com, paulmck@...nel.org, akpm@...ux-foundation.org,
quic_neeraju@...cinc.com, rdunlap@...radead.org,
damien.lemoal@...nsource.wdc.com, songmuchun@...edance.com,
peterz@...radead.org, jpoimboe@...nel.org, pbonzini@...hat.com,
chang.seok.bae@...el.com, pawan.kumar.gupta@...ux.intel.com,
jmattson@...gle.com, daniel.sneddon@...ux.intel.com,
sandipan.das@....com, tony.luck@...el.com, james.morse@....com,
linux-doc@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
bagasdotme@...il.com, eranian@...gle.com,
christophe.leroy@...roup.eu, jarkko@...nel.org,
adrian.hunter@...el.com, quic_jiles@...cinc.com,
peternewman@...gle.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v12 04/10] x86/resctrl: Add comments on RFTYPE flags
hierarchy
Hi Reinette,
On 10/10/23 19:56, Reinette Chatre wrote:
> Hi Babu,
>
> On 10/10/2023 4:33 PM, Babu Moger wrote:
>> resctrl uses RFTYPE flags for creating resctrl directory structure.
>>
>> Definitions and directory structures are not documented. Add
>> comments to improve the readability and help future additions.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Babu Moger <babu.moger@....com>
>> Tested-by: Peter Newman <peternewman@...gle.com>
>> Reviewed-by: Peter Newman <peternewman@...gle.com>
>> Tested-by: Tan Shaopeng <tan.shaopeng@...fujitsu.com>
>> Reviewed-by: Tan Shaopeng <tan.shaopeng@...fujitsu.com>
>> Reviewed-by: Fenghua Yu <fenghua.yu@...el.com>
>> Reviewed-by: Reinette Chatre <reinette.chatre@...el.com>
>> Reviewed-by: Ilpo Järvinen <ilpo.jarvinen@...ux.intel.com>
>> ---
>> v12: Moved the comments from arch/x86/kernel/cpu/resctrl/internal.h
>> to Documentation/arch/x86/resctrl.rst. (Boris)
>> ---
>
> It seems like you just copied the text to the documentation without
> taking into account the destination's use of reST syntax.
>
> I tried a "make htmldocs" to see how this looks but encountered:
> docutils.utils.SystemMessage: [snip]/linux/Documentation/arch/x86/resctrl.rst:398: (SEVERE/4) Unexpected section title.
My bad. Just tested the format by opening using the browser. Forgot about
make htmldocs. Will fix it now.
>
> Please remove my Reviewed-by.
Sure. Will remove Reviewed-by on this patch. Please let me know about
other patches when you get a chance.
--
Thanks
Babu Moger
Powered by blists - more mailing lists