[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <8fe8c652-b5c6-4e24-9847-7c3bb01279c0@huawei.com>
Date: Wed, 11 Oct 2023 11:03:20 +0800
From: Kefeng Wang <wangkefeng.wang@...wei.com>
To: Matthew Wilcox <willy@...radead.org>
CC: Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>, <linux-mm@...ck.org>,
<linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, <ying.huang@...el.com>,
<david@...hat.com>, Zi Yan <ziy@...dia.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH -next 4/7] mm: convert xchg_page_access_time to
xchg_folio_access_time()
On 2023/10/10 20:27, Matthew Wilcox wrote:
> On Tue, Oct 10, 2023 at 02:45:41PM +0800, Kefeng Wang wrote:
>> Make xchg_page_access_time to take a folio, and rename it to
>> xchg_folio_access_time() since all callers with a folio.
>
> You're doing this the hard way, which makes life hard for the reviewrs.
>
> patch 1. Introduce folio->_last_cpupid
> patch 2: Add
>
> static inline int folio_xchg_access_time(struct folio *folio, int time)
> {
> return xchg_page_access_time(&folio->page, time);
> }
>
> patch 3-n: Convert callers
> Patch n+1: Remove xchg_page_access_time(), folding it into
> folio_xchg_access_time().
Ok, I will follow this way, thanks for your advise.
>
> Similarly for page_cpupid_xchg_last / folio_cpupid_xchg_last().
> (why is this not called folio_xchg_last_cpupid?)
Fine with me, will update.
Thanks.
>
>
Powered by blists - more mailing lists