[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20231011163003.32036b28@hermes.local>
Date: Wed, 11 Oct 2023 16:30:03 -0700
From: Stephen Hemminger <stephen@...workplumber.org>
To: Florian Fainelli <florian.fainelli@...adcom.com>
Cc: netdev@...r.kernel.org, Andrew Lunn <andrew@...n.ch>,
Florian Fainelli <f.fainelli@...il.com>,
Vladimir Oltean <olteanv@...il.com>,
"David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
Eric Dumazet <edumazet@...gle.com>,
Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>,
Paolo Abeni <pabeni@...hat.com>,
Broadcom internal kernel review list
<bcm-kernel-feedback-list@...adcom.com>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org (open list:ARM/Mediatek SoC support),
linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org (moderated list:ARM/Mediatek SoC
support)
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next v2 2/2] net: dsa: Rename IFLA_DSA_MASTER to
IFLA_DSA_CONDUIT
On Wed, 11 Oct 2023 15:20:26 -0700
Florian Fainelli <florian.fainelli@...adcom.com> wrote:
> enum {
> IFLA_DSA_UNSPEC,
> - IFLA_DSA_MASTER,
> + IFLA_DSA_CONDUIT,
> + /* Deprecated, use IFLA_DSA_CONDUIT insted */
> + IFLA_DSA_MASTER = IFLA_DSA_CONDUIT,
> __IFLA_DSA_MAX,
> };
minor nit s/insted/instead/
I don't know if it would be acceptable in the kernel UAPI but what
we did in DPDK for similar situation to cause warning on use of deprecated value.
/**
* Macro to mark macros and defines scheduled for removal
*/
#if defined(RTE_CC_GCC) || defined(RTE_CC_CLANG)
#define RTE_PRAGMA(x) _Pragma(#x)
#define RTE_PRAGMA_WARNING(w) RTE_PRAGMA(GCC warning #w)
#define RTE_DEPRECATED(x) RTE_PRAGMA_WARNING(#x is deprecated)
#else
#define RTE_DEPRECATED(x)
#endif
...
#define RTE_DEV_WHITELISTED \
RTE_DEPRECATED(RTE_DEV_WHITELISTED) RTE_DEV_ALLOWED
#define RTE_DEV_BLACKLISTED \
RTE_DEPRECATED(RTE_DEV_BLACKLISTED) RTE_DEV_BLOCKED
Powered by blists - more mailing lists