[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAFA6WYMdrCfqMVExYBbhCK7vUSQffyUfSWpQO0=HeQc6Edz9OA@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 11 Oct 2023 11:27:13 +0530
From: Sumit Garg <sumit.garg@...aro.org>
To: Jarkko Sakkinen <jarkko@...nel.org>
Cc: keyrings@...r.kernel.org,
Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>,
stable@...r.kernel.org, James Bottomley <jejb@...ux.ibm.com>,
Mimi Zohar <zohar@...ux.ibm.com>,
David Howells <dhowells@...hat.com>,
Paul Moore <paul@...l-moore.com>,
James Morris <jmorris@...ei.org>,
"Serge E. Hallyn" <serge@...lyn.com>,
"open list:KEYS-TRUSTED" <linux-integrity@...r.kernel.org>,
"open list:SECURITY SUBSYSTEM"
<linux-security-module@...r.kernel.org>,
open list <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] KEYS: trusted: Rollback init_trusted() consistently
On Wed, 11 Oct 2023 at 04:46, Jarkko Sakkinen <jarkko@...nel.org> wrote:
>
> Do bind neither static calls nor trusted_key_exit() before a successful
> init, in order to maintain a consistent state. In addition, depart the
> init_trusted() in the case of a real error (i.e. getting back something
> else than -ENODEV).
>
> Reported-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>
> Closes: https://lore.kernel.org/linux-integrity/CAHk-=whOPoLaWM8S8GgoOPT7a2+nMH5h3TLKtn=R_3w4R1_Uvg@mail.gmail.com/
> Cc: stable@...r.kernel.org # v5.13+
> Fixes: 5d0682be3189 ("KEYS: trusted: Add generic trusted keys framework")
> Signed-off-by: Jarkko Sakkinen <jarkko@...nel.org>
> ---
> security/keys/trusted-keys/trusted_core.c | 20 ++++++++++----------
> 1 file changed, 10 insertions(+), 10 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/security/keys/trusted-keys/trusted_core.c b/security/keys/trusted-keys/trusted_core.c
> index 85fb5c22529a..fee1ab2c734d 100644
> --- a/security/keys/trusted-keys/trusted_core.c
> +++ b/security/keys/trusted-keys/trusted_core.c
> @@ -358,17 +358,17 @@ static int __init init_trusted(void)
> if (!get_random)
> get_random = kernel_get_random;
>
> - static_call_update(trusted_key_seal,
> - trusted_key_sources[i].ops->seal);
> - static_call_update(trusted_key_unseal,
> - trusted_key_sources[i].ops->unseal);
> - static_call_update(trusted_key_get_random,
> - get_random);
> - trusted_key_exit = trusted_key_sources[i].ops->exit;
> - migratable = trusted_key_sources[i].ops->migratable;
> -
> ret = trusted_key_sources[i].ops->init();
> - if (!ret)
> + if (!ret) {
> + static_call_update(trusted_key_seal, trusted_key_sources[i].ops->seal);
> + static_call_update(trusted_key_unseal, trusted_key_sources[i].ops->unseal);
> + static_call_update(trusted_key_get_random, get_random);
> +
> + trusted_key_exit = trusted_key_sources[i].ops->exit;
> + migratable = trusted_key_sources[i].ops->migratable;
> + }
> +
> + if (!ret || ret != -ENODEV)
As mentioned in the other thread, we should allow other trust sources
to be initialized if the primary one fails.
-Sumit
> break;
> }
>
> --
> 2.39.2
>
Powered by blists - more mailing lists