linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] [RFC] wireless: move obsolete drivers to staging

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <87r0m14khb.fsf@kernel.org>
Date:   Wed, 11 Oct 2023 11:44:00 +0300
From:   Kalle Valo <kvalo@...nel.org>
To:     "Arnd Bergmann" <arnd@...db.de>
Cc:     "Greg Kroah-Hartman" <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
        "Arnd Bergmann" <arnd@...nel.org>,
        "Alexandre Belloni" <alexandre.belloni@...tlin.com>,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-staging@...ts.linux.dev,
        linux-wireless@...r.kernel.org,
        "Claudiu Beznea" <claudiu.beznea@...on.dev>,
        "Pavel Machek" <pavel@....cz>, "Jakub Kicinski" <kuba@...nel.org>,
        "David S . Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
        linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org,
        "Larry Finger" <Larry.Finger@...inger.net>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] [RFC] wireless: move obsolete drivers to staging

"Arnd Bergmann" <arnd@...db.de> writes:

> On Wed, Oct 11, 2023, at 07:40, Kalle Valo wrote:
>> Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org> writes:
>>
>> We (the wireless folks) have been talking about dropping legacy drivers
>> on and off for several years now. The problem is that we don't know
>> which of them work and which not, for example IIRC someone reported
>> recently that wl3501 still works.
>>
>> Personally I would be extremly happy to remove all the ancient drivers
>> as that reduces the amount of code for us to maintain but is that the
>> right thing to do for the users? I don't have an answer to that,
>> comments very welcome.
>
> I had a look at what openwrt enables, to see if any of the drivers
> in my RFC patch are actually enabled, if anything supports legacy
> embedded devices with these it would be openwrt. The good news here
> is that openwrt intentionally leaves WEXT disabled, and none of them
> are still in use.

I don't think openwrt is a good metric in this case. These drivers are
for 20+ years old hardware, most likely running on really old x86
laptops. So the chances of them running openwrt on those laptops is low
and I would expect them to run more traditional distros like debian or
ubuntu. But of course this is just guessing.

-- 
https://patchwork.kernel.org/project/linux-wireless/list/

https://wireless.wiki.kernel.org/en/developers/documentation/submittingpatches