linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v10 20/54] media: Remove duplicated index vs q->num

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <ab98f6df-206b-48a0-a8ec-4d105bae0e22@xs4all.nl>
Date:   Wed, 11 Oct 2023 10:54:35 +0200
From:   Hans Verkuil <hverkuil-cisco@...all.nl>
To:     Benjamin Gaignard <benjamin.gaignard@...labora.com>,
        mchehab@...nel.org, tfiga@...omium.org, m.szyprowski@...sung.com,
        ming.qian@....com, ezequiel@...guardiasur.com.ar,
        p.zabel@...gutronix.de, gregkh@...uxfoundation.org,
        nicolas.dufresne@...labora.com
Cc:     linux-media@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org,
        linux-mediatek@...ts.infradead.org, linux-arm-msm@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-rockchip@...ts.infradead.org, linux-staging@...ts.linux.dev,
        kernel@...labora.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v10 20/54] media: Remove duplicated index vs
 q->num_buffers check

Subject should start with "media: videobuf2:".

Regards,

	Hans

On 03/10/2023 10:06, Benjamin Gaignard wrote:
> vb2_get_buffer() already checks if the requested index is valid.
> Stop duplicating this kind of check everywhere.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Benjamin Gaignard <benjamin.gaignard@...labora.com>
> ---
>  drivers/media/common/videobuf2/videobuf2-v4l2.c | 13 -------------
>  1 file changed, 13 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/media/common/videobuf2/videobuf2-v4l2.c b/drivers/media/common/videobuf2/videobuf2-v4l2.c
> index 42da0adc052a..cf881c8d8d4d 100644
> --- a/drivers/media/common/videobuf2/videobuf2-v4l2.c
> +++ b/drivers/media/common/videobuf2/videobuf2-v4l2.c
> @@ -378,11 +378,6 @@ static int vb2_queue_or_prepare_buf(struct vb2_queue *q, struct media_device *md
>  		return -EINVAL;
>  	}
>  
> -	if (b->index >= q->num_buffers) {
> -		dprintk(q, 1, "%s: buffer index out of range\n", opname);
> -		return -EINVAL;
> -	}
> -
>  	vb = vb2_get_buffer(q, b->index);
>  	if (!vb) {
>  		dprintk(q, 1, "%s: buffer %u is NULL\n", opname,  b->index);
> @@ -833,10 +828,6 @@ int vb2_qbuf(struct vb2_queue *q, struct media_device *mdev,
>  		return -EBUSY;
>  	}
>  
> -	if (b->index >= q->num_buffers) {
> -		dprintk(q, 1, "buffer index out of range\n");
> -		return -EINVAL;
> -	}
>  	vb = vb2_get_buffer(q, b->index);
>  	if (!vb) {
>  		dprintk(q, 1, "can't find the requested buffer %u\n", b->index);
> @@ -908,10 +899,6 @@ int vb2_expbuf(struct vb2_queue *q, struct v4l2_exportbuffer *eb)
>  {
>  	struct vb2_buffer *vb;
>  
> -	if (eb->index >= q->num_buffers) {
> -		dprintk(q, 1, "buffer index out of range\n");
> -		return -EINVAL;
> -	}
>  	vb = vb2_get_buffer(q, eb->index);
>  	if (!vb) {
>  		dprintk(q, 1, "can't find the requested buffer %u\n", eb->index);