[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20231011100655.979626-10-ruanjinjie@huawei.com>
Date: Wed, 11 Oct 2023 10:06:49 +0000
From: Jinjie Ruan <ruanjinjie@...wei.com>
To: <catalin.marinas@....com>, <will@...nel.org>,
<mark.rutland@....com>, <broonie@...nel.org>,
<anshuman.khandual@....com>, <alexandru.elisei@....com>,
<sashal@...nel.org>, <maz@...nel.org>,
<gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>, <james.morse@....com>,
<pcc@...gle.com>, <scott@...amperecomputing.com>,
<ebiederm@...ssion.com>, <haibinzhang@...cent.com>,
<hewenliang4@...wei.com>, <linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>,
<linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, <stable@...nel.org>
CC: <ruanjinjie@...wei.com>
Subject: [PATCH v5.15 09/15] arm64: factor insn read out of call_undef_hook()
From: Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@....com>
commit dbfbd87efa79575491af0ba1a87bf567eaea6cae upstream.
Subsequent patches will rework EL0 UNDEF handling, removing the need for
struct undef_hook and call_undef_hook. In preparation for those changes,
this patch factors the logic for reading user instructions out of
call_undef_hook() and into a new user_insn_read() helper, matching the
style of the existing aarch64_insn_read() helper used for reading kernel
instructions.
There should be no functional change as a result of this patch.
Signed-off-by: Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@....com>
Cc: Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@....com>
Cc: James Morse <james.morse@....com>
Cc: Joey Gouly <joey.gouly@....com>
Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>
Cc: Will Deacon <will@...nel.org>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20221019144123.612388-5-mark.rutland@arm.com
Signed-off-by: Will Deacon <will@...nel.org>
Signed-off-by: Jinjie Ruan <ruanjinjie@...wei.com>
---
arch/arm64/kernel/traps.c | 31 ++++++++++++++++++++++---------
1 file changed, 22 insertions(+), 9 deletions(-)
diff --git a/arch/arm64/kernel/traps.c b/arch/arm64/kernel/traps.c
index 7d9bdd79797f..e943b7c46d86 100644
--- a/arch/arm64/kernel/traps.c
+++ b/arch/arm64/kernel/traps.c
@@ -394,25 +394,22 @@ void unregister_undef_hook(struct undef_hook *hook)
raw_spin_unlock_irqrestore(&undef_lock, flags);
}
-static int call_undef_hook(struct pt_regs *regs)
+static int user_insn_read(struct pt_regs *regs, u32 *insnp)
{
- struct undef_hook *hook;
- unsigned long flags;
u32 instr;
- int (*fn)(struct pt_regs *regs, u32 instr) = NULL;
void __user *pc = (void __user *)instruction_pointer(regs);
if (compat_thumb_mode(regs)) {
/* 16-bit Thumb instruction */
__le16 instr_le;
if (get_user(instr_le, (__le16 __user *)pc))
- goto exit;
+ return -EFAULT;
instr = le16_to_cpu(instr_le);
if (aarch32_insn_is_wide(instr)) {
u32 instr2;
if (get_user(instr_le, (__le16 __user *)(pc + 2)))
- goto exit;
+ return -EFAULT;
instr2 = le16_to_cpu(instr_le);
instr = (instr << 16) | instr2;
}
@@ -420,10 +417,20 @@ static int call_undef_hook(struct pt_regs *regs)
/* 32-bit ARM instruction */
__le32 instr_le;
if (get_user(instr_le, (__le32 __user *)pc))
- goto exit;
+ return -EFAULT;
instr = le32_to_cpu(instr_le);
}
+ *insnp = instr;
+ return 0;
+}
+
+static int call_undef_hook(struct pt_regs *regs, u32 instr)
+{
+ struct undef_hook *hook;
+ unsigned long flags;
+ int (*fn)(struct pt_regs *regs, u32 instr) = NULL;
+
raw_spin_lock_irqsave(&undef_lock, flags);
list_for_each_entry(hook, &undef_hook, node)
if ((instr & hook->instr_mask) == hook->instr_val &&
@@ -431,7 +438,7 @@ static int call_undef_hook(struct pt_regs *regs)
fn = hook->fn;
raw_spin_unlock_irqrestore(&undef_lock, flags);
-exit:
+
return fn ? fn(regs, instr) : 1;
}
@@ -483,13 +490,19 @@ void arm64_notify_segfault(unsigned long addr)
void do_el0_undef(struct pt_regs *regs, unsigned long esr)
{
+ u32 insn;
+
/* check for AArch32 breakpoint instructions */
if (!aarch32_break_handler(regs))
return;
- if (call_undef_hook(regs) == 0)
+ if (user_insn_read(regs, &insn))
+ goto out_err;
+
+ if (call_undef_hook(regs, insn) == 0)
return;
+out_err:
force_signal_inject(SIGILL, ILL_ILLOPC, regs->pc, 0);
}
--
2.34.1
Powered by blists - more mailing lists