[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <01230ca8-505b-74c2-7872-24b5411c6b2e@quicinc.com>
Date: Wed, 11 Oct 2023 16:09:29 +0530
From: Mrinmay Sarkar <quic_msarkar@...cinc.com>
To: Manivannan Sadhasivam <mani@...nel.org>
CC: <agross@...nel.org>, <andersson@...nel.org>,
<krzysztof.kozlowski+dt@...aro.org>, <conor+dt@...nel.org>,
<konrad.dybcio@...aro.org>, <quic_shazhuss@...cinc.com>,
<quic_nitegupt@...cinc.com>, <quic_ramkri@...cinc.com>,
<quic_nayiluri@...cinc.com>, <quic_krichai@...cinc.com>,
<quic_vbadigan@...cinc.com>, <quic_parass@...cinc.com>,
Bjorn Helgaas <bhelgaas@...gle.com>,
Lorenzo Pieralisi <lpieralisi@...nel.org>,
Krzysztof WilczyĆski <kw@...ux.com>,
Rob Herring <robh@...nel.org>,
Kishon Vijay Abraham I <kishon@...nel.org>,
Vinod Koul <vkoul@...nel.org>, <linux-pci@...r.kernel.org>,
<linux-arm-msm@...r.kernel.org>, <devicetree@...r.kernel.org>,
<linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, <mhi@...ts.linux.dev>,
<linux-phy@...ts.infradead.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v1 4/5] PCI: epf-mhi: Add support for SA8775P
On 9/21/2023 2:10 PM, Manivannan Sadhasivam wrote:
> On Wed, Sep 20, 2023 at 07:25:11PM +0530, Mrinmay Sarkar wrote:
>> Add support for Qualcomm Snapdragon SA8775P SoC to the EPF driver.
>> SA8775P has the PID (0x0306) and supports HDMA. Currently, it has
>> no fixed PCI class, so it is being advertised as "PCI_CLASS_OTHERS".
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Mrinmay Sarkar <quic_msarkar@...cinc.com>
>> ---
>> drivers/pci/endpoint/functions/pci-epf-mhi.c | 18 ++++++++++++++++++
>> 1 file changed, 18 insertions(+)
>>
>> diff --git a/drivers/pci/endpoint/functions/pci-epf-mhi.c b/drivers/pci/endpoint/functions/pci-epf-mhi.c
>> index b7b9d3e..4b349fd 100644
>> --- a/drivers/pci/endpoint/functions/pci-epf-mhi.c
>> +++ b/drivers/pci/endpoint/functions/pci-epf-mhi.c
>> @@ -114,6 +114,23 @@ static const struct pci_epf_mhi_ep_info sm8450_info = {
>> .flags = MHI_EPF_USE_DMA,
>> };
>>
>> +static struct pci_epf_header sa8775p_header = {
> static const struct...
>
>> + .vendorid = PCI_VENDOR_ID_QCOM,
>> + .deviceid = 0x0306,
> Why are you not using a distinct device id?
>
> - Mani
distinct device id for EP is not created yet as of now we are reusing this.
Will update once device id is decided.
Thanks,
Mrinmay
>> + .baseclass_code = PCI_CLASS_OTHERS,
>> + .interrupt_pin = PCI_INTERRUPT_INTA,
>> +};
>> +
>> +static const struct pci_epf_mhi_ep_info sa8775p_info = {
>> + .config = &mhi_v1_config,
>> + .epf_header = &sa8775p_header,
>> + .bar_num = BAR_0,
>> + .epf_flags = PCI_BASE_ADDRESS_MEM_TYPE_32,
>> + .msi_count = 32,
>> + .mru = 0x8000,
>> + .flags = MHI_EPF_USE_DMA,
>> +};
>> +
>> struct pci_epf_mhi {
>> const struct pci_epc_features *epc_features;
>> const struct pci_epf_mhi_ep_info *info;
>> @@ -677,6 +694,7 @@ static int pci_epf_mhi_probe(struct pci_epf *epf,
>> }
>>
>> static const struct pci_epf_device_id pci_epf_mhi_ids[] = {
>> + { .name = "sa8775p", .driver_data = (kernel_ulong_t)&sa8775p_info },
>> { .name = "sdx55", .driver_data = (kernel_ulong_t)&sdx55_info },
>> { .name = "sm8450", .driver_data = (kernel_ulong_t)&sm8450_info },
>> {},
>> --
>> 2.7.4
>>
Powered by blists - more mailing lists