linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] clocksource/drivers/arm_arch_timer: Initialize evtstrm after finalizing cpucaps

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Wed, 11 Oct 2023 11:42:03 +0100
From:   Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@....com>
To:     Daniel Lezcano <daniel.lezcano@...aro.org>
Cc:     linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
        maz@...nel.org, tglx@...utronix.de
Subject: Re: [PATCH] clocksource/drivers/arm_arch_timer: Initialize evtstrm
 after finalizing cpucaps

On Wed, Oct 11, 2023 at 12:06:20PM +0200, Daniel Lezcano wrote:
> On 11/10/2023 11:36, Mark Rutland wrote:
> > On Wed, Oct 11, 2023 at 10:30:39AM +0200, Daniel Lezcano wrote:
> > > Applied thanks
> > 
> > This got folded into a larger series that we were hoping to take through the arm64 tree:
> > 
> >    https://lore.kernel.org/linux-arm-kernel/20231010103139.3113421-1-mark.rutland@arm.com/
> >    https://lore.kernel.org/linux-arm-kernel/20231010103139.3113421-2-mark.rutland@arm.com/
> > 
> > I think that won't conflict, since all that's changed is the commit text, but
> > it might be worth dropping this patch for now to avoid the risk of a conflict.
> 
> Sure, thanks for letting me know. I was suspecting that was the case :)
> 
> I've dropped it

Thanks, and sorry for the hassle!

Mark.