| lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
|
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Message-Id: <20231011120857.251943-3-zhouchuyi@bytedance.com>
Date: Wed, 11 Oct 2023 20:08:51 +0800
From: Chuyi Zhou <zhouchuyi@...edance.com>
To: bpf@...r.kernel.org
Cc: ast@...nel.org, daniel@...earbox.net, andrii@...nel.org,
martin.lau@...nel.org, tj@...nel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Chuyi Zhou <zhouchuyi@...edance.com>
Subject: [PATCH bpf-next v5 2/8] bpf: Introduce css_task open-coded iterator kfuncs
This patch adds kfuncs bpf_iter_css_task_{new,next,destroy} which allow
creation and manipulation of struct bpf_iter_css_task in open-coded
iterator style. These kfuncs actually wrapps css_task_iter_{start,next,
end}. BPF programs can use these kfuncs through bpf_for_each macro for
iteration of all tasks under a css.
css_task_iter_*() would try to get the global spin-lock *css_set_lock*, so
the bpf side has to be careful in where it allows to use this iter.
Currently we only allow it in bpf_lsm and bpf iter-s.
Signed-off-by: Chuyi Zhou <zhouchuyi@...edance.com>
Acked-by: Tejun Heo <tj@...nel.org>
---
kernel/bpf/helpers.c | 3 ++
kernel/bpf/task_iter.c | 53 +++++++++++++++++++
kernel/bpf/verifier.c | 23 ++++++++
.../testing/selftests/bpf/bpf_experimental.h | 8 +++
4 files changed, 87 insertions(+)
diff --git a/kernel/bpf/helpers.c b/kernel/bpf/helpers.c
index d2840dd5b00d..cb24c4a916df 100644
--- a/kernel/bpf/helpers.c
+++ b/kernel/bpf/helpers.c
@@ -2552,6 +2552,9 @@ BTF_ID_FLAGS(func, bpf_dynptr_slice_rdwr, KF_RET_NULL)
BTF_ID_FLAGS(func, bpf_iter_num_new, KF_ITER_NEW)
BTF_ID_FLAGS(func, bpf_iter_num_next, KF_ITER_NEXT | KF_RET_NULL)
BTF_ID_FLAGS(func, bpf_iter_num_destroy, KF_ITER_DESTROY)
+BTF_ID_FLAGS(func, bpf_iter_css_task_new, KF_ITER_NEW | KF_TRUSTED_ARGS)
+BTF_ID_FLAGS(func, bpf_iter_css_task_next, KF_ITER_NEXT | KF_RET_NULL)
+BTF_ID_FLAGS(func, bpf_iter_css_task_destroy, KF_ITER_DESTROY)
BTF_ID_FLAGS(func, bpf_dynptr_adjust)
BTF_ID_FLAGS(func, bpf_dynptr_is_null)
BTF_ID_FLAGS(func, bpf_dynptr_is_rdonly)
diff --git a/kernel/bpf/task_iter.c b/kernel/bpf/task_iter.c
index 7473068ed313..2cfcb4dd8a37 100644
--- a/kernel/bpf/task_iter.c
+++ b/kernel/bpf/task_iter.c
@@ -7,6 +7,7 @@
#include <linux/fs.h>
#include <linux/fdtable.h>
#include <linux/filter.h>
+#include <linux/bpf_mem_alloc.h>
#include <linux/btf_ids.h>
#include "mmap_unlock_work.h"
@@ -803,6 +804,58 @@ const struct bpf_func_proto bpf_find_vma_proto = {
.arg5_type = ARG_ANYTHING,
};
+struct bpf_iter_css_task {
+ __u64 __opaque[1];
+} __attribute__((aligned(8)));
+
+struct bpf_iter_css_task_kern {
+ struct css_task_iter *css_it;
+} __attribute__((aligned(8)));
+
+__bpf_kfunc int bpf_iter_css_task_new(struct bpf_iter_css_task *it,
+ struct cgroup_subsys_state *css, unsigned int flags)
+{
+ struct bpf_iter_css_task_kern *kit = (void *)it;
+
+ BUILD_BUG_ON(sizeof(struct bpf_iter_css_task_kern) != sizeof(struct bpf_iter_css_task));
+ BUILD_BUG_ON(__alignof__(struct bpf_iter_css_task_kern) !=
+ __alignof__(struct bpf_iter_css_task));
+ kit->css_it = NULL;
+ switch (flags) {
+ case CSS_TASK_ITER_PROCS | CSS_TASK_ITER_THREADED:
+ case CSS_TASK_ITER_PROCS:
+ case 0:
+ break;
+ default:
+ return -EINVAL;
+ }
+
+ kit->css_it = bpf_mem_alloc(&bpf_global_ma, sizeof(struct css_task_iter));
+ if (!kit->css_it)
+ return -ENOMEM;
+ css_task_iter_start(css, flags, kit->css_it);
+ return 0;
+}
+
+__bpf_kfunc struct task_struct *bpf_iter_css_task_next(struct bpf_iter_css_task *it)
+{
+ struct bpf_iter_css_task_kern *kit = (void *)it;
+
+ if (!kit->css_it)
+ return NULL;
+ return css_task_iter_next(kit->css_it);
+}
+
+__bpf_kfunc void bpf_iter_css_task_destroy(struct bpf_iter_css_task *it)
+{
+ struct bpf_iter_css_task_kern *kit = (void *)it;
+
+ if (!kit->css_it)
+ return;
+ css_task_iter_end(kit->css_it);
+ bpf_mem_free(&bpf_global_ma, kit->css_it);
+}
+
DEFINE_PER_CPU(struct mmap_unlock_irq_work, mmap_unlock_work);
static void do_mmap_read_unlock(struct irq_work *entry)
diff --git a/kernel/bpf/verifier.c b/kernel/bpf/verifier.c
index eed7350e15f4..528d375c17ee 100644
--- a/kernel/bpf/verifier.c
+++ b/kernel/bpf/verifier.c
@@ -10450,6 +10450,7 @@ enum special_kfunc_type {
KF_bpf_percpu_obj_new_impl,
KF_bpf_percpu_obj_drop_impl,
KF_bpf_throw,
+ KF_bpf_iter_css_task_new,
};
BTF_SET_START(special_kfunc_set)
@@ -10473,6 +10474,7 @@ BTF_ID(func, bpf_dynptr_clone)
BTF_ID(func, bpf_percpu_obj_new_impl)
BTF_ID(func, bpf_percpu_obj_drop_impl)
BTF_ID(func, bpf_throw)
+BTF_ID(func, bpf_iter_css_task_new)
BTF_SET_END(special_kfunc_set)
BTF_ID_LIST(special_kfunc_list)
@@ -10498,6 +10500,7 @@ BTF_ID(func, bpf_dynptr_clone)
BTF_ID(func, bpf_percpu_obj_new_impl)
BTF_ID(func, bpf_percpu_obj_drop_impl)
BTF_ID(func, bpf_throw)
+BTF_ID(func, bpf_iter_css_task_new)
static bool is_kfunc_ret_null(struct bpf_kfunc_call_arg_meta *meta)
{
@@ -11028,6 +11031,20 @@ static int process_kf_arg_ptr_to_rbtree_node(struct bpf_verifier_env *env,
&meta->arg_rbtree_root.field);
}
+static bool check_css_task_iter_allowlist(struct bpf_verifier_env *env)
+{
+ enum bpf_prog_type prog_type = resolve_prog_type(env->prog);
+
+ switch (prog_type) {
+ case BPF_PROG_TYPE_LSM:
+ return true;
+ case BPF_TRACE_ITER:
+ return env->prog->aux->sleepable;
+ default:
+ return false;
+ }
+}
+
static int check_kfunc_args(struct bpf_verifier_env *env, struct bpf_kfunc_call_arg_meta *meta,
int insn_idx)
{
@@ -11278,6 +11295,12 @@ static int check_kfunc_args(struct bpf_verifier_env *env, struct bpf_kfunc_call_
break;
}
case KF_ARG_PTR_TO_ITER:
+ if (meta->func_id == special_kfunc_list[KF_bpf_iter_css_task_new]) {
+ if (!check_css_task_iter_allowlist(env)) {
+ verbose(env, "css_task_iter is only allowed in bpf_lsm and bpf iter-s\n");
+ return -EINVAL;
+ }
+ }
ret = process_iter_arg(env, regno, insn_idx, meta);
if (ret < 0)
return ret;
diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/bpf_experimental.h b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/bpf_experimental.h
index 9aa29564bd74..8b53537e0f27 100644
--- a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/bpf_experimental.h
+++ b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/bpf_experimental.h
@@ -450,4 +450,12 @@ extern void bpf_throw(u64 cookie) __ksym;
__bpf_assert_op(LHS, <=, END, value, false); \
})
+struct bpf_iter_css_task;
+struct cgroup_subsys_state;
+extern int bpf_iter_css_task_new(struct bpf_iter_css_task *it,
+ struct cgroup_subsys_state *css, unsigned int flags) __weak __ksym;
+extern struct task_struct *bpf_iter_css_task_next(struct bpf_iter_css_task *it) __weak __ksym;
+extern void bpf_iter_css_task_destroy(struct bpf_iter_css_task *it) __weak __ksym;
+
+
#endif
--
2.20.1
Powered by blists - more mailing lists