linux-kernel - [PATCH bpf-next v5 3/8] bpf: Introduce task open coded iterator kfuncs

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <20231011120857.251943-4-zhouchuyi@bytedance.com>
Date:   Wed, 11 Oct 2023 20:08:52 +0800
From:   Chuyi Zhou <zhouchuyi@...edance.com>
To:     bpf@...r.kernel.org
Cc:     ast@...nel.org, daniel@...earbox.net, andrii@...nel.org,
        martin.lau@...nel.org, tj@...nel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
        Chuyi Zhou <zhouchuyi@...edance.com>
Subject: [PATCH bpf-next v5 3/8] bpf: Introduce task open coded iterator kfuncs

This patch adds kfuncs bpf_iter_task_{new,next,destroy} which allow
creation and manipulation of struct bpf_iter_task in open-coded iterator
style. BPF programs can use these kfuncs or through bpf_for_each macro to
iterate all processes in the system.

The API design keep consistent with SEC("iter/task"). bpf_iter_task_new()
accepts a specific task and iterating type which allows:

1. iterating all process in the system(BPF_TASK_ITER_ALL_PROCS)

2. iterating all threads in the system(BPF_TASK_ITER_ALL_THREADS)

3. iterating all threads of a specific task(BPF_TASK_ITER_PROC_THREADS)

Signed-off-by: Chuyi Zhou <zhouchuyi@...edance.com>
---
 kernel/bpf/helpers.c                          |  3 +
 kernel/bpf/task_iter.c                        | 82 +++++++++++++++++++
 .../testing/selftests/bpf/bpf_experimental.h  |  5 ++
 3 files changed, 90 insertions(+)

diff --git a/kernel/bpf/helpers.c b/kernel/bpf/helpers.c
index cb24c4a916df..690763751f6e 100644
--- a/kernel/bpf/helpers.c
+++ b/kernel/bpf/helpers.c
@@ -2555,6 +2555,9 @@ BTF_ID_FLAGS(func, bpf_iter_num_destroy, KF_ITER_DESTROY)
 BTF_ID_FLAGS(func, bpf_iter_css_task_new, KF_ITER_NEW | KF_TRUSTED_ARGS)
 BTF_ID_FLAGS(func, bpf_iter_css_task_next, KF_ITER_NEXT | KF_RET_NULL)
 BTF_ID_FLAGS(func, bpf_iter_css_task_destroy, KF_ITER_DESTROY)
+BTF_ID_FLAGS(func, bpf_iter_task_new, KF_ITER_NEW | KF_TRUSTED_ARGS)
+BTF_ID_FLAGS(func, bpf_iter_task_next, KF_ITER_NEXT | KF_RET_NULL)
+BTF_ID_FLAGS(func, bpf_iter_task_destroy, KF_ITER_DESTROY)
 BTF_ID_FLAGS(func, bpf_dynptr_adjust)
 BTF_ID_FLAGS(func, bpf_dynptr_is_null)
 BTF_ID_FLAGS(func, bpf_dynptr_is_rdonly)
diff --git a/kernel/bpf/task_iter.c b/kernel/bpf/task_iter.c
index 2cfcb4dd8a37..caeddad3d2f1 100644
--- a/kernel/bpf/task_iter.c
+++ b/kernel/bpf/task_iter.c
@@ -856,6 +856,88 @@ __bpf_kfunc void bpf_iter_css_task_destroy(struct bpf_iter_css_task *it)
 	bpf_mem_free(&bpf_global_ma, kit->css_it);
 }
 
+struct bpf_iter_task {
+	__u64 __opaque[3];
+} __attribute__((aligned(8)));
+
+struct bpf_iter_task_kern {
+	struct task_struct *task;
+	struct task_struct *pos;
+	unsigned int flags;
+} __attribute__((aligned(8)));
+
+enum {
+	BPF_TASK_ITER_ALL_PROCS,
+	BPF_TASK_ITER_ALL_THREADS,
+	BPF_TASK_ITER_PROC_THREADS
+};
+
+__bpf_kfunc int bpf_iter_task_new(struct bpf_iter_task *it,
+		struct task_struct *task, unsigned int flags)
+{
+	struct bpf_iter_task_kern *kit = (void *)it;
+
+	BUILD_BUG_ON(sizeof(struct bpf_iter_task_kern) > sizeof(struct bpf_iter_task));
+	BUILD_BUG_ON(__alignof__(struct bpf_iter_task_kern) !=
+					__alignof__(struct bpf_iter_task));
+
+	kit->task = kit->pos = NULL;
+	switch (flags) {
+	case BPF_TASK_ITER_ALL_THREADS:
+	case BPF_TASK_ITER_ALL_PROCS:
+	case BPF_TASK_ITER_PROC_THREADS:
+		break;
+	default:
+		return -EINVAL;
+	}
+
+	if (flags == BPF_TASK_ITER_PROC_THREADS)
+		kit->task = task;
+	else
+		kit->task = &init_task;
+	kit->pos = kit->task;
+	kit->flags = flags;
+	return 0;
+}
+
+__bpf_kfunc struct task_struct *bpf_iter_task_next(struct bpf_iter_task *it)
+{
+	struct bpf_iter_task_kern *kit = (void *)it;
+	struct task_struct *pos;
+	unsigned int flags;
+
+	flags = kit->flags;
+	pos = kit->pos;
+
+	if (!pos)
+		goto out;
+
+	if (flags == BPF_TASK_ITER_ALL_PROCS)
+		goto get_next_task;
+
+	kit->pos = next_thread(kit->pos);
+	if (kit->pos == kit->task) {
+		if (flags == BPF_TASK_ITER_PROC_THREADS) {
+			kit->pos = NULL;
+			goto out;
+		}
+	} else
+		goto out;
+
+get_next_task:
+	kit->pos = next_task(kit->pos);
+	kit->task = kit->pos;
+	if (kit->pos == &init_task)
+		kit->pos = NULL;
+
+out:
+	return pos;
+}
+
+__bpf_kfunc void bpf_iter_task_destroy(struct bpf_iter_task *it)
+{
+}
+
 DEFINE_PER_CPU(struct mmap_unlock_irq_work, mmap_unlock_work);
 
 static void do_mmap_read_unlock(struct irq_work *entry)
diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/bpf_experimental.h b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/bpf_experimental.h
index 8b53537e0f27..1ec82997cce7 100644
--- a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/bpf_experimental.h
+++ b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/bpf_experimental.h
@@ -457,5 +457,10 @@ extern int bpf_iter_css_task_new(struct bpf_iter_css_task *it,
 extern struct task_struct *bpf_iter_css_task_next(struct bpf_iter_css_task *it) __weak __ksym;
 extern void bpf_iter_css_task_destroy(struct bpf_iter_css_task *it) __weak __ksym;
 
+struct bpf_iter_task;
+extern int bpf_iter_task_new(struct bpf_iter_task *it,
+		struct task_struct *task, unsigned int flags) __weak __ksym;
+extern struct task_struct *bpf_iter_task_next(struct bpf_iter_task *it) __weak __ksym;
+extern void bpf_iter_task_destroy(struct bpf_iter_task *it) __weak __ksym;
 
 #endif
-- 
2.20.1