lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAHtyXDdr_R_Moypb3ieFs54RRGu+zqHS46WrjEvWCFtT0KZRaQ@mail.gmail.com>
Date:   Wed, 11 Oct 2023 15:08:34 +0200
From:   Tomáš Glozar <tglozar@...il.com>
To:     Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>
Cc:     "Russell King (Oracle)" <linux@...linux.org.uk>,
        Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>,
        linux-acpi@...r.kernel.org, James Morse <james.morse@....com>,
        loongarch@...ts.linux.dev, linux-arch@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-pm@...r.kernel.org, Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>,
        Jean-Philippe Brucker <jean-philippe@...aro.org>,
        jianyong.wu@....com, justin.he@....com,
        Borislav Petkov <bp@...en8.de>,
        Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@...ux.intel.com>, x86@...nel.org,
        Salil Mehta <salil.mehta@...wei.com>,
        "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>,
        Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
        linux-ia64@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] cpu-hotplug: provide prototypes for arch CPU registration

Hello Thomas,

st 11. 10. 2023 v 14:06 odesílatel Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de> napsal:
>
> Sorry for the wrong information about ia64. The removal did not happen
> because someone stepped up as a possible maintainer.
>

Does that mean that the removal patch will be reverted soon in
asm-generic and linux-next? Both have no ia64 as of now, and there are
already a few patches without ia64 part (e,g,
https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/arnd/asm-generic.git/commit/?id=2fd0ebad27bcd4c8fc61c61a98d4283c47054bcf).
Without the revert, patches affecting ia64 will conflict.

I am the person who volunteered to maintain the architecture. If the
removal was indeed cancelled, me and Frank Scheiner can start testing
and reviewing patches affecting ia64.

Thanks,

Tomas

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ