[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <b4136500fe6c49ee689dba139ce25824684719f2.camel@kernel.org>
Date: Wed, 11 Oct 2023 09:09:38 -0400
From: Jeff Layton <jlayton@...nel.org>
To: Chandan Babu R <chandan.babu@...cle.com>,
"Darrick J. Wong" <djwong@...nel.org>,
Chuck Lever <chuck.lever@...cle.com>
Cc: linux-nfs@...r.kernel.org, linux-xfs@...r.kernel.org,
linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
brauner@...nel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] xfs: reinstate the old i_version counter as
STATX_CHANGE_COOKIE
On Fri, 2023-09-29 at 14:43 -0400, Jeff Layton wrote:
> The handling of STATX_CHANGE_COOKIE was moved into generic_fillattr in
> commit 0d72b92883c6 (fs: pass the request_mask to generic_fillattr), but
> we didn't account for the fact that xfs doesn't call generic_fillattr at
> all.
>
> Make XFS report its i_version as the STATX_CHANGE_COOKIE.
>
> Fixes: 0d72b92883c6 (fs: pass the request_mask to generic_fillattr)
> Signed-off-by: Jeff Layton <jlayton@...nel.org>
> ---
> I had hoped to fix this in a better way with the multigrain patches, but
> it's taking longer than expected (if it even pans out at this point).
>
> Until then, make sure we use XFS's i_version as the STATX_CHANGE_COOKIE,
> even if it's bumped due to atime updates. Too many invalidations is
> preferable to not enough.
> ---
> fs/xfs/xfs_iops.c | 5 +++++
> 1 file changed, 5 insertions(+)
>
> diff --git a/fs/xfs/xfs_iops.c b/fs/xfs/xfs_iops.c
> index 1c1e6171209d..2b3b05c28e9e 100644
> --- a/fs/xfs/xfs_iops.c
> +++ b/fs/xfs/xfs_iops.c
> @@ -584,6 +584,11 @@ xfs_vn_getattr(
> }
> }
>
> + if ((request_mask & STATX_CHANGE_COOKIE) && IS_I_VERSION(inode)) {
> + stat->change_cookie = inode_query_iversion(inode);
> + stat->result_mask |= STATX_CHANGE_COOKIE;
> + }
> +
> /*
> * Note: If you add another clause to set an attribute flag, please
> * update attributes_mask below.
>
> ---
> base-commit: df964ce9ef9fea10cf131bf6bad8658fde7956f6
> change-id: 20230929-xfs-iversion-819fa2c18591
>
> Best regards,
Ping?
This patch is needed in v6.6 to prevent a regression when serving XFS
via NFSD. I'd prefer this go in via the xfs tree, but let me know if
you need me to get this merged this via a different one.
Thanks,
--
Jeff Layton <jlayton@...nel.org>
Powered by blists - more mailing lists