[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <e20542ca-3150-e281-b677-f6f6532d8181@suse.cz>
Date: Wed, 11 Oct 2023 15:31:50 +0200
From: Vlastimil Babka <vbabka@...e.cz>
To: Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@....com>
Cc: linux-mm@...ck.org, Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@....com>,
Peter Collingbourne <pcc@...gle.com>,
Petr Tesarik <petr.tesarik.ext@...wei.com>
Subject: Re: [RESEND PATCH] mm: slab: Do not create kmalloc caches smaller
than arch_slab_minalign()
On 10/9/23 13:20, Catalin Marinas wrote:
>> > mm/slab_common.c | 7 +++++--
>> > 1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
>> >
>> > diff --git a/mm/slab_common.c b/mm/slab_common.c
>> > index cd71f9581e67..8b45922ed295 100644
>> > --- a/mm/slab_common.c
>> > +++ b/mm/slab_common.c
>> > @@ -895,10 +895,13 @@ void __init setup_kmalloc_cache_index_table(void)
>> >
>> > static unsigned int __kmalloc_minalign(void)
>> > {
>> > + unsigned int minalign = dma_get_cache_alignment();
>> > +
>> > if (IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_DMA_BOUNCE_UNALIGNED_KMALLOC) &&
>> > is_swiotlb_allocated())
>> > - return ARCH_KMALLOC_MINALIGN;
>> > - return dma_get_cache_alignment();
>> > + minalign = ARCH_KMALLOC_MINALIGN;
>> > +
>> > + return ALIGN(minalign, arch_slab_minalign());
>>
>> Could it be max() instead of ALIGN()? It would be more obvious, at least to
>> me :)
>
> Yeah, max() would do since they are all a power of two. Do you want me
> to repost?
No need, picked up and changed locally. Thanks!
Powered by blists - more mailing lists