| lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
|
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Message-ID: <7df53e6b-9141-de85-b7a3-b9eb092ef7b4@redhat.com>
Date: Thu, 12 Oct 2023 17:22:56 +0200
From: Eric Auger <eric.auger@...hat.com>
To: Miguel Luis <miguel.luis@...cle.com>,
Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@....com>,
Will Deacon <will@...nel.org>, Marc Zyngier <maz@...nel.org>,
Oliver Upton <oliver.upton@...ux.dev>,
James Morse <james.morse@....com>,
Suzuki K Poulose <suzuki.poulose@....com>,
Zenghui Yu <yuzenghui@...wei.com>,
Jing Zhang <jingzhangos@...gle.com>,
linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
kvmarm@...ts.linux.dev
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 3/3] arm64/kvm: Fine grain _EL2 system registers list
that affect nested virtualization
Hi Miguel,
On 10/11/23 20:01, Miguel Luis wrote:
> Implement a fine grained approach in the _EL2 sysreg ranges.
>
> Fixes: d0fc0a2519a6 ("KVM: arm64: nv: Add trap forwarding for HCR_EL2")
> Signed-off-by: Miguel Luis <miguel.luis@...cle.com>
> ---
> arch/arm64/kvm/emulate-nested.c | 88 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++---
> 1 file changed, 82 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/arch/arm64/kvm/emulate-nested.c b/arch/arm64/kvm/emulate-nested.c
> index 9ced1bf0c2b7..3af49e130ee6 100644
> --- a/arch/arm64/kvm/emulate-nested.c
> +++ b/arch/arm64/kvm/emulate-nested.c
> @@ -648,15 +648,91 @@ static const struct encoding_to_trap_config encoding_to_cgt[] __initconst = {
> SR_TRAP(SYS_APGAKEYLO_EL1, CGT_HCR_APK),
> SR_TRAP(SYS_APGAKEYHI_EL1, CGT_HCR_APK),
> /* All _EL2 registers */
> - SR_RANGE_TRAP(sys_reg(3, 4, 0, 0, 0),
> - sys_reg(3, 4, 3, 15, 7), CGT_HCR_NV),
> + SR_TRAP(SYS_VPIDR_EL2, CGT_HCR_NV),
I think you miss DBGVCR32_EL2
> + SR_TRAP(SYS_VMPIDR_EL2, CGT_HCR_NV),
> + SR_TRAP(SYS_SCTLR_EL2, CGT_HCR_NV),
> + SR_TRAP(SYS_ACTLR_EL2, CGT_HCR_NV),
> + SR_TRAP(SYS_SCTLR2_EL2, CGT_HCR_NV),
> + SR_RANGE_TRAP(SYS_HCR_EL2,
> + SYS_HCRX_EL2, CGT_HCR_NV),
> + SR_TRAP(SYS_SMPRIMAP_EL2, CGT_HCR_NV),
> + SR_TRAP(SYS_SMCR_EL2, CGT_HCR_NV),
> + SR_TRAP(SYS_SDER32_EL2, CGT_HCR_NV),
> + SR_RANGE_TRAP(SYS_TTBR0_EL2,
> + SYS_TCR2_EL2, CGT_HCR_NV),
> + SR_TRAP(SYS_VTTBR_EL2, CGT_HCR_NV),
> + SR_TRAP(SYS_VTCR_EL2, CGT_HCR_NV),
> + SR_TRAP(SYS_VNCR_EL2, CGT_HCR_NV),
> + SR_TRAP(SYS_VSTTBR_EL2, CGT_HCR_NV),
> + SR_TRAP(SYS_VSTCR_EL2, CGT_HCR_NV),
> + SR_TRAP(SYS_DACR32_EL2, CGT_HCR_NV),
> + SR_RANGE_TRAP(SYS_HDFGRTR_EL2,
> + SYS_HAFGRTR_EL2, CGT_HCR_NV),
> /* Skip the SP_EL1 encoding... */
> SR_TRAP(SYS_SPSR_EL2, CGT_HCR_NV),
> SR_TRAP(SYS_ELR_EL2, CGT_HCR_NV),
> - SR_RANGE_TRAP(sys_reg(3, 4, 4, 1, 1),
> - sys_reg(3, 4, 10, 15, 7), CGT_HCR_NV),
> - SR_RANGE_TRAP(sys_reg(3, 4, 12, 0, 0),
> - sys_reg(3, 4, 14, 15, 7), CGT_HCR_NV),
> + /* SPSR_irq, SPSR_abt, SPSR_und, SPSR_fiq */
> + SR_RANGE_TRAP(sys_reg(3, 4, 4, 3, 0),
> + sys_reg(3, 4, 4, 3, 3), CGT_HCR_NV),
> + SR_TRAP(SYS_IFSR32_EL2, CGT_HCR_NV),
> + SR_TRAP(SYS_AFSR0_EL2, CGT_HCR_NV),
> + SR_TRAP(SYS_AFSR1_EL2, CGT_HCR_NV),
> + SR_TRAP(SYS_ESR_EL2, CGT_HCR_NV),
> + SR_TRAP(SYS_VSESR_EL2, CGT_HCR_NV),
> + SR_TRAP(SYS_FPEXC32_EL2, CGT_HCR_NV),
> + SR_TRAP(SYS_TFSR_EL2, CGT_HCR_NV),
> + SR_TRAP(SYS_FAR_EL2, CGT_HCR_NV),
> + SR_TRAP(SYS_HPFAR_EL2, CGT_HCR_NV),
you miss BRBCR_EL2
> + SR_TRAP(SYS_PMSCR_EL2, CGT_HCR_NV),
> + SR_TRAP(SYS_MAIR_EL2, CGT_HCR_NV),
> + SR_TRAP(SYS_AMAIR_EL2, CGT_HCR_NV),
> + SR_TRAP(SYS_MPAMHCR_EL2, CGT_HCR_NV),
> + SR_TRAP(SYS_MPAMVPMV_EL2, CGT_HCR_NV),
> + SR_TRAP(SYS_MPAM2_EL2, CGT_HCR_NV),
> + SR_RANGE_TRAP(SYS_MPAMVPM0_EL2,
> + SYS_MPAMVPM7_EL2, CGT_HCR_NV),
About the MPAM where did you find the pseudo code?
> + /*
> + * Note that the spec. describes a group of MEC registers
> + * whose access should not trap, therefore skip the following:
> + * MECID_A0_EL2, MECID_A1_EL2, MECID_P0_EL2,
> + * MECID_P1_EL2, MECIDR_EL2, VMECID_A_EL2,
> + * VMECID_P_EL2.
> + */
> + SR_RANGE_TRAP(SYS_VBAR_EL2,
> + SYS_RMR_EL2, CGT_HCR_NV),
> + SR_TRAP(SYS_VDISR_EL2, CGT_HCR_NV),
> + /* ICH_AP0R<m>_EL2 */
> + SR_RANGE_TRAP(SYS_ICH_AP0R0_EL2,
> + SYS_ICH_AP0R3_EL2, CGT_HCR_NV),
> + /* ICH_AP1R<m>_EL2 */
> + SR_RANGE_TRAP(SYS_ICH_AP1R0_EL2,
> + SYS_ICH_AP1R3_EL2, CGT_HCR_NV),
> + SR_TRAP(SYS_ICC_SRE_EL2, CGT_HCR_NV),
> + SR_RANGE_TRAP(SYS_ICH_HCR_EL2,
> + SYS_ICH_EISR_EL2, CGT_HCR_NV),
> + SR_TRAP(SYS_ICH_ELRSR_EL2, CGT_HCR_NV),
> + SR_TRAP(SYS_ICH_VMCR_EL2, CGT_HCR_NV),
> + /* ICH_LR<m>_EL2 */
> + SR_RANGE_TRAP(SYS_ICH_LR0_EL2,
> + SYS_ICH_LR15_EL2, CGT_HCR_NV),
> + SR_TRAP(SYS_CONTEXTIDR_EL2, CGT_HCR_NV),
> + SR_TRAP(SYS_TPIDR_EL2, CGT_HCR_NV),
> + SR_TRAP(SYS_SCXTNUM_EL2, CGT_HCR_NV),
> + /* AMEVCNTVOFF0<n>_EL2, AMEVCNTVOFF1<n>_EL2 */
> + SR_RANGE_TRAP(SYS_AMEVCNTVOFF0n_EL2(0),
> + SYS_AMEVCNTVOFF1n_EL2(15), CGT_HCR_NV),
> + /* CNT*_EL2 */
> + SR_TRAP(SYS_CNTVOFF_EL2, CGT_HCR_NV),
> + SR_TRAP(SYS_CNTPOFF_EL2, CGT_HCR_NV),
> + SR_TRAP(SYS_CNTHCTL_EL2, CGT_HCR_NV),
> + SR_RANGE_TRAP(SYS_CNTHP_TVAL_EL2,
> + SYS_CNTHP_CVAL_EL2, CGT_HCR_NV),
> + SR_RANGE_TRAP(SYS_CNTHV_TVAL_EL2,
> + SYS_CNTHV_CVAL_EL2, CGT_HCR_NV),
> + SR_RANGE_TRAP(SYS_CNTHVS_TVAL_EL2,
> + SYS_CNTHVS_CVAL_EL2, CGT_HCR_NV),
> + SR_RANGE_TRAP(SYS_CNTHPS_TVAL_EL2,
> + SYS_CNTHPS_CVAL_EL2, CGT_HCR_NV),
> /* All _EL02, _EL12 registers */
> SR_RANGE_TRAP(sys_reg(3, 5, 0, 0, 0),
> sys_reg(3, 5, 10, 15, 7), CGT_HCR_NV),
Besides this looks good to me and to me this looks safer than the
previous large span approach but that's my taste ;-)
Thanks
Eric
Powered by blists - more mailing lists