linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] pwm: pxa: Explicitly include correct DT includes

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <CAL_Jsq++418hPW=wSGWipbC6vodYvKiDUQNMAm22g5X6k-to-A@mail.gmail.com>
Date:   Thu, 12 Oct 2023 14:48:43 -0500
From:   Rob Herring <robh@...nel.org>
To:     Uwe Kleine-König 
        <u.kleine-koenig@...gutronix.de>
Cc:     Thierry Reding <thierry.reding@...il.com>,
        linux-pwm@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] pwm: pxa: Explicitly include correct DT includes

On Wed, Oct 11, 2023 at 3:41 AM Uwe Kleine-König
<u.kleine-koenig@...gutronix.de> wrote:
>
> On Mon, Oct 09, 2023 at 12:29:17PM -0500, Rob Herring wrote:
> > The DT of_device.h and of_platform.h date back to the separate
> > of_platform_bus_type before it as merged into the regular platform bus.
> > As part of that merge prepping Arm DT support 13 years ago, they
> > "temporarily" include each other. They also include platform_device.h
> > and of.h. As a result, there's a pretty much random mix of those include
> > files used throughout the tree. In order to detangle these headers and
> > replace the implicit includes with struct declarations, users need to
> > explicitly include the correct includes.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Rob Herring <robh@...nel.org>
> > ---
> >  drivers/pwm/pwm-pxa.c | 2 +-
> >  1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/drivers/pwm/pwm-pxa.c b/drivers/pwm/pwm-pxa.c
> > index 1e475ed10180..78b04e017c49 100644
> > --- a/drivers/pwm/pwm-pxa.c
> > +++ b/drivers/pwm/pwm-pxa.c
> > @@ -24,7 +24,7 @@
> >  #include <linux/clk.h>
> >  #include <linux/io.h>
> >  #include <linux/pwm.h>
> > -#include <linux/of_device.h>
> > +#include <linux/of.h>
>
> Even without both headers the driver compiles fine as linux/pwm.h
> includes of.h.

Yes, that's just one of several:

 include/linux/pm_domain.h  | 4 +++-
 include/linux/remoteproc.h | 3 ++-
 include/linux/thermal.h    | 4 +++-
 include/linux/cpu_cooling.h                | 1 -
 include/linux/fsl/bestcomm/bestcomm_priv.h | 1 -
 include/linux/mailbox_client.h             | 4 ++--
 include/linux/mailbox_controller.h         | 2 +-
 include/linux/phy/phy.h                    | 5 +++--
 include/linux/pwm.h                        | 4 +++-
 include/net/dsa.h                          | 2 +-

>
> I think we should do:
>
> diff --git a/include/linux/pwm.h b/include/linux/pwm.h
> index d2f9f690a9c1..9e35970ca2ab 100644
> --- a/include/linux/pwm.h
> +++ b/include/linux/pwm.h
> @@ -4,8 +4,8 @@
>
>  #include <linux/err.h>
>  #include <linux/mutex.h>
> -#include <linux/of.h>
>
> +struct of_phandle_args;

Also used in the header:

+struct device;
+struct fwnode_handle;

>  struct pwm_chip;
>
>  /**
>
> drivers/pmw/* compiles fine with this change.

Agreed in what I tested so far.

But I'm running out of gas on doing more of this, so once I get
of_device.h and of_platform.h detangled, I'm probably done for a while
at least. IOW, feel free to submit a patch for pwm.h.

>
> Other than that:
>
> Acked-by: Uwe Kleine-König <u.kleine-koenig@...gutronix.de>

Thanks!

Rob