[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <5694b2bd-de40-45c0-8b38-ac01bc11798a@zytor.com>
Date: Thu, 12 Oct 2023 14:21:39 -0700
From: "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>
To: Uros Bizjak <ubizjak@...il.com>
Cc: Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@...el.com>, x86@...nel.org,
xen-devel@...ts.xenproject.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Juergen Gross <jgross@...e.com>,
Boris Ostrovsky <boris.ostrovsky@...cle.com>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>, Borislav Petkov <bp@...en8.de>,
Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@...ux.intel.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 0/4] Introduce %rip-relative addressing to PER_CPU_VAR
macro
On 10/12/23 14:17, Uros Bizjak wrote:
>>
>> Are you PIC-adjusting the percpu variables as well?
>
> After this patch (and after fixing percpu_stable_op to use "a" operand
> modifier on GCC), the only *one* remaining absolute reference to
> percpu variable remain in xen-head.S, where:
>
> movq $INIT_PER_CPU_VAR(fixed_percpu_data),%rax
>
> should be changed to use leaq.
>
> All others should then be (%rip)-relative.
>
I mean, the symbols themselves are relative, not absolute?
-hpa
Powered by blists - more mailing lists