lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <ZShzSvrN7FgdXi71@x1n>
Date:   Thu, 12 Oct 2023 18:29:30 -0400
From:   Peter Xu <peterx@...hat.com>
To:     Suren Baghdasaryan <surenb@...gle.com>
Cc:     akpm@...ux-foundation.org, viro@...iv.linux.org.uk,
        brauner@...nel.org, shuah@...nel.org, aarcange@...hat.com,
        lokeshgidra@...gle.com, david@...hat.com, hughd@...gle.com,
        mhocko@...e.com, axelrasmussen@...gle.com, rppt@...nel.org,
        willy@...radead.org, Liam.Howlett@...cle.com, jannh@...gle.com,
        zhangpeng362@...wei.com, bgeffon@...gle.com,
        kaleshsingh@...gle.com, ngeoffray@...gle.com, jdduke@...gle.com,
        linux-mm@...ck.org, linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-kselftest@...r.kernel.org,
        kernel-team@...roid.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 3/3] selftests/mm: add UFFDIO_MOVE ioctl test

On Sun, Oct 08, 2023 at 11:42:28PM -0700, Suren Baghdasaryan wrote:
> Add a test for new UFFDIO_MOVE ioctl which uses uffd to move source
> into destination buffer while checking the contents of both after
> remapping. After the operation the content of the destination buffer
> should match the original source buffer's content while the source
> buffer should be zeroed.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Suren Baghdasaryan <surenb@...gle.com>
> ---
>  tools/testing/selftests/mm/uffd-common.c     | 41 ++++++++++++-
>  tools/testing/selftests/mm/uffd-common.h     |  1 +
>  tools/testing/selftests/mm/uffd-unit-tests.c | 62 ++++++++++++++++++++
>  3 files changed, 102 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/mm/uffd-common.c b/tools/testing/selftests/mm/uffd-common.c
> index 02b89860e193..ecc1244f1c2b 100644
> --- a/tools/testing/selftests/mm/uffd-common.c
> +++ b/tools/testing/selftests/mm/uffd-common.c
> @@ -52,6 +52,13 @@ static int anon_allocate_area(void **alloc_area, bool is_src)
>  		*alloc_area = NULL;
>  		return -errno;
>  	}
> +
> +	/* Prevent source pages from collapsing into THPs */
> +	if (madvise(*alloc_area, nr_pages * page_size, MADV_NOHUGEPAGE)) {
> +		*alloc_area = NULL;
> +		return -errno;
> +	}

Can we move this to test specific code?

> +
>  	return 0;
>  }
>  
> @@ -484,8 +491,14 @@ void uffd_handle_page_fault(struct uffd_msg *msg, struct uffd_args *args)
>  		offset = (char *)(unsigned long)msg->arg.pagefault.address - area_dst;
>  		offset &= ~(page_size-1);
>  
> -		if (copy_page(uffd, offset, args->apply_wp))
> -			args->missing_faults++;
> +		/* UFFD_MOVE is supported for anon non-shared mappings. */
> +		if (uffd_test_ops == &anon_uffd_test_ops && !map_shared) {

IIUC this means move_page() will start to run on many other tests... as
long as anonymous & private.  Probably not wanted, because not all tests
may need this MOVE test, and it also means UFFDIO_COPY is never tested on
anonymous..

You can overwrite uffd_args.handle_fault().  Axel just added a hook which
seems also usable here.  See 99aa77215ad02.

> +			if (move_page(uffd, offset))
> +				args->missing_faults++;
> +		} else {
> +			if (copy_page(uffd, offset, args->apply_wp))
> +				args->missing_faults++;
> +		}
>  	}
>  }
>  
> @@ -620,6 +633,30 @@ int copy_page(int ufd, unsigned long offset, bool wp)
>  	return __copy_page(ufd, offset, false, wp);
>  }
>  
> +int move_page(int ufd, unsigned long offset)
> +{
> +	struct uffdio_move uffdio_move;
> +
> +	if (offset >= nr_pages * page_size)
> +		err("unexpected offset %lu\n", offset);
> +	uffdio_move.dst = (unsigned long) area_dst + offset;
> +	uffdio_move.src = (unsigned long) area_src + offset;
> +	uffdio_move.len = page_size;
> +	uffdio_move.mode = UFFDIO_MOVE_MODE_ALLOW_SRC_HOLES;
> +	uffdio_move.move = 0;
> +	if (ioctl(ufd, UFFDIO_MOVE, &uffdio_move)) {
> +		/* real retval in uffdio_move.move */
> +		if (uffdio_move.move != -EEXIST)
> +			err("UFFDIO_MOVE error: %"PRId64,
> +			    (int64_t)uffdio_move.move);
> +		wake_range(ufd, uffdio_move.dst, page_size);
> +	} else if (uffdio_move.move != page_size) {
> +		err("UFFDIO_MOVE error: %"PRId64, (int64_t)uffdio_move.move);
> +	} else
> +		return 1;
> +	return 0;
> +}
> +
>  int uffd_open_dev(unsigned int flags)
>  {
>  	int fd, uffd;
> diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/mm/uffd-common.h b/tools/testing/selftests/mm/uffd-common.h
> index 7c4fa964c3b0..f4d79e169a3d 100644
> --- a/tools/testing/selftests/mm/uffd-common.h
> +++ b/tools/testing/selftests/mm/uffd-common.h
> @@ -111,6 +111,7 @@ void wp_range(int ufd, __u64 start, __u64 len, bool wp);
>  void uffd_handle_page_fault(struct uffd_msg *msg, struct uffd_args *args);
>  int __copy_page(int ufd, unsigned long offset, bool retry, bool wp);
>  int copy_page(int ufd, unsigned long offset, bool wp);
> +int move_page(int ufd, unsigned long offset);
>  void *uffd_poll_thread(void *arg);
>  
>  int uffd_open_dev(unsigned int flags);
> diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/mm/uffd-unit-tests.c b/tools/testing/selftests/mm/uffd-unit-tests.c
> index 2709a34a39c5..f0ded3b34367 100644
> --- a/tools/testing/selftests/mm/uffd-unit-tests.c
> +++ b/tools/testing/selftests/mm/uffd-unit-tests.c
> @@ -824,6 +824,10 @@ static void uffd_events_test_common(bool wp)
>  	char c;
>  	struct uffd_args args = { 0 };
>  
> +	/* Prevent source pages from being mapped more than once */
> +	if (madvise(area_src, nr_pages * page_size, MADV_DONTFORK))
> +		err("madvise(MADV_DONTFORK) failed");

Modifying events test is weird.. I assume you don't need this anymore after
you switch to the handle_fault() hook.

> +
>  	fcntl(uffd, F_SETFL, uffd_flags | O_NONBLOCK);
>  	if (uffd_register(uffd, area_dst, nr_pages * page_size,
>  			  true, wp, false))
> @@ -1062,6 +1066,58 @@ static void uffd_poison_test(uffd_test_args_t *targs)
>  	uffd_test_pass();
>  }
>  
> +static void uffd_move_test(uffd_test_args_t *targs)
> +{
> +	unsigned long nr;
> +	pthread_t uffd_mon;
> +	char c;
> +	unsigned long long count;
> +	struct uffd_args args = { 0 };
> +
> +	if (uffd_register(uffd, area_dst, nr_pages * page_size,
> +			  true, false, false))
> +		err("register failure");
> +
> +	if (pthread_create(&uffd_mon, NULL, uffd_poll_thread, &args))
> +		err("uffd_poll_thread create");
> +
> +	/*
> +	 * Read each of the pages back using the UFFD-registered mapping. We
> +	 * expect that the first time we touch a page, it will result in a missing
> +	 * fault. uffd_poll_thread will resolve the fault by remapping source
> +	 * page to destination.
> +	 */
> +	for (nr = 0; nr < nr_pages; nr++) {
> +		/* Check area_src content */
> +		count = *area_count(area_src, nr);
> +		if (count != count_verify[nr])
> +			err("nr %lu source memory invalid %llu %llu\n",
> +			    nr, count, count_verify[nr]);
> +
> +		/* Faulting into area_dst should remap the page */
> +		count = *area_count(area_dst, nr);
> +		if (count != count_verify[nr])
> +			err("nr %lu memory corruption %llu %llu\n",
> +			    nr, count, count_verify[nr]);
> +
> +		/* Re-check area_src content which should be empty */
> +		count = *area_count(area_src, nr);
> +		if (count != 0)
> +			err("nr %lu move failed %llu %llu\n",
> +			    nr, count, count_verify[nr]);

All of above should see zeros, right?  Because I don't think anyone boosted
the counter at all..

Maybe set some non-zero values to it?  Then the re-check can make more
sense.

If you want, I think we can also make uffd-stress.c test to cover MOVE too,
basically replacing all UFFDIO_COPY when e.g. user specified from cmdline.
Optional, and may need some touch ups here and there, though.

Thanks,

> +	}
> +
> +	if (write(pipefd[1], &c, sizeof(c)) != sizeof(c))
> +		err("pipe write");
> +	if (pthread_join(uffd_mon, NULL))
> +		err("join() failed");
> +
> +	if (args.missing_faults != nr_pages || args.minor_faults != 0)
> +		uffd_test_fail("stats check error");
> +	else
> +		uffd_test_pass();
> +}
> +
>  /*
>   * Test the returned uffdio_register.ioctls with different register modes.
>   * Note that _UFFDIO_ZEROPAGE is tested separately in the zeropage test.
> @@ -1139,6 +1195,12 @@ uffd_test_case_t uffd_tests[] = {
>  		.mem_targets = MEM_ALL,
>  		.uffd_feature_required = 0,
>  	},
> +	{
> +		.name = "move",
> +		.uffd_fn = uffd_move_test,
> +		.mem_targets = MEM_ANON,
> +		.uffd_feature_required = UFFD_FEATURE_MOVE,
> +	},
>  	{
>  		.name = "wp-fork",
>  		.uffd_fn = uffd_wp_fork_test,
> -- 
> 2.42.0.609.gbb76f46606-goog
> 

-- 
Peter Xu

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ