lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <874jiw4614.fsf@minerva.mail-host-address-is-not-set>
Date:   Thu, 12 Oct 2023 10:08:23 +0200
From:   Javier Martinez Canillas <javierm@...hat.com>
To:     Geert Uytterhoeven <geert@...ux-m68k.org>
Cc:     linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
        Thomas Zimmermann <tzimmermann@...e.de>,
        Conor Dooley <conor@...nel.org>,
        Peter Robinson <pbrobinson@...il.com>,
        Rob Herring <robh@...nel.org>,
        Maxime Ripard <mripard@...nel.org>,
        Conor Dooley <conor+dt@...nel.org>,
        Daniel Vetter <daniel@...ll.ch>,
        David Airlie <airlied@...il.com>,
        Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski+dt@...aro.org>,
        Maarten Lankhorst <maarten.lankhorst@...ux.intel.com>,
        Rob Herring <robh+dt@...nel.org>, devicetree@...r.kernel.org,
        dri-devel@...ts.freedesktop.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 5/6] dt-bindings: display: Split common Solomon
 properties in their own schema

Geert Uytterhoeven <geert@...ux-m68k.org> writes:

> Hi Javier,
>
> On Thu, Oct 12, 2023 at 8:58 AM Javier Martinez Canillas
> <javierm@...hat.com> wrote:
>> There are DT properties that can be shared across different Solomon OLED
>> Display Controller families. Split them into a separate common schema to
>> avoid these properties to be duplicated in different DT bindings schemas.
>>
>> Suggested-by: Rob Herring <robh@...nel.org>
>> Signed-off-by: Javier Martinez Canillas <javierm@...hat.com>
>> ---
>>
>> (no changes since v1)
>
> New patch in v2.
>

Yeah, I mention that in the cover letter. That "(no changes since...)"
message is automatically added by the tool I use to post patches (patman)
for all patches that don't have a change history, even for new patches in
a series revision. And I don't know of a way to disable it...

Maybe what I should do is to add a change history to new patches mentioned
that is a new patch to prevent this message to appear.

-- 
Best regards,

Javier Martinez Canillas
Core Platforms
Red Hat

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ