[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <5af8290e693c7b5927dd7d12cc9d20ed3d6ebaa7.camel@mediatek.com>
Date: Thu, 12 Oct 2023 01:40:44 +0000
From: CK Hu (胡俊光) <ck.hu@...iatek.com>
To: "angelogioacchino.delregno@...labora.com"
<angelogioacchino.delregno@...labora.com>,
"chunkuang.hu@...nel.org" <chunkuang.hu@...nel.org>
CC: "linux-mediatek@...ts.infradead.org"
<linux-mediatek@...ts.infradead.org>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
"wenst@...omium.org" <wenst@...omium.org>,
Jason-JH Lin (林睿祥)
<Jason-JH.Lin@...iatek.com>,
"kernel@...labora.com" <kernel@...labora.com>,
"dri-devel@...ts.freedesktop.org" <dri-devel@...ts.freedesktop.org>,
"amergnat@...libre.com" <amergnat@...libre.com>,
"ehristev@...labora.com" <ehristev@...labora.com>,
"linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org"
<linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>,
"matthias.bgg@...il.com" <matthias.bgg@...il.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v10 13/16] drm/mediatek: gamma: Program gamma LUT type for
descending or rising
Hi, Angelo:
On Fri, 2023-08-04 at 09:28 +0200, AngeloGioacchino Del Regno wrote:
> All of the SoCs that don't have dithering control in the gamma IP
> have got a GAMMA_LUT_TYPE bit that tells to the IP if the LUT is
> "descending" (bit set) or "rising" (bit cleared): make sure to set
> it correctly after programming the LUT.
>
> Signed-off-by: AngeloGioacchino Del Regno <
> angelogioacchino.delregno@...labora.com>
> Reviewed-by: Jason-JH.Lin <jason-jh.lin@...iatek.com>
> Reviewed-by: Alexandre Mergnat <amergnat@...libre.com>
> ---
> drivers/gpu/drm/mediatek/mtk_disp_gamma.c | 20 ++++++++++++++++++++
> 1 file changed, 20 insertions(+)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/mediatek/mtk_disp_gamma.c
> b/drivers/gpu/drm/mediatek/mtk_disp_gamma.c
> index fbff9f97b737..d9a70238d524 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/mediatek/mtk_disp_gamma.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/mediatek/mtk_disp_gamma.c
> @@ -22,6 +22,7 @@
> #define GAMMA_RELAY_MODE BIT(0)
> #define GAMMA_LUT_EN BIT(1)
> #define GAMMA_DITHERING BIT(2)
> +#define GAMMA_LUT_TYPE BIT(2)
> #define DISP_GAMMA_SIZE 0x0030
> #define DISP_GAMMA_SIZE_HSIZE GENMASK
> (28, 16)
> #define DISP_GAMMA_SIZE_VSIZE GENMASK
> (12, 0)
> @@ -86,6 +87,17 @@ unsigned int mtk_gamma_get_lut_size(struct device
> *dev)
> return LUT_SIZE_DEFAULT;
> }
>
> +static bool mtk_gamma_lut_is_descending(struct drm_color_lut *lut,
> u32 lut_size)
> +{
> + u64 first, last;
> + int last_entry = lut_size - 1;
> +
> + first = lut[0].red + lut[0].green + lut[0].blue;
> + last = lut[last_entry].red + lut[last_entry].green +
> lut[last_entry].blue;
> +
> + return !!(first > last);
> +}
> +
> /*
> * SoCs supporting 12-bits LUTs are using a new register layout that
> does
> * always support (by HW) both 12-bits and 10-bits LUT but, on
> those, we
> @@ -175,6 +187,14 @@ void mtk_gamma_set(struct device *dev, struct
> drm_crtc_state *state)
> }
> }
>
> + if (!gamma->data->has_dither) {
> + /* Descending or Rising LUT */
> + if (mtk_gamma_lut_is_descending(lut, gamma->data-
> >lut_size - 1))
> + cfg_val |= FIELD_PREP(GAMMA_LUT_TYPE, 1);
Reviewed-by: CK Hu <ck.hu@...iatek.com>
But I'm not sure why not write it more simply as
cfg_val |= GAMMA_LUT_TYPE;
Regards,
CK
> + else
> + cfg_val &= ~GAMMA_LUT_TYPE;
> + }
> +
> /* Enable the gamma table */
> cfg_val |= FIELD_PREP(GAMMA_LUT_EN, 1);
>
Powered by blists - more mailing lists