| lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
|
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Date: Thu, 12 Oct 2023 17:23:23 +0530
From: Naresh Kamboju <naresh.kamboju@...aro.org>
To: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>,
Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
Cc: Masami Hiramatsu <mhiramat@...nel.org>, stable@...r.kernel.org,
patches@...ts.linux.dev, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
torvalds@...ux-foundation.org, akpm@...ux-foundation.org,
linux@...ck-us.net, shuah@...nel.org, patches@...nelci.org,
lkft-triage@...ts.linaro.org, pavel@...x.de, jonathanh@...dia.com,
f.fainelli@...il.com, sudipm.mukherjee@...il.com,
srw@...dewatkins.net, rwarsow@....de,
Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@....com>,
"Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@...nel.org>,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 4.19 00/29] 4.19.282-rc1 review
On Wed, 11 Oct 2023 at 20:14, Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org> wrote:
>
> On Wed, 11 Oct 2023 11:05:48 +0200
> Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org> wrote:
>
> > > Ok, I'll queue it up now, I didn't realize it needed to be there, sorry.
> >
> > Nope, I can't, it doesn't apply there, so I need a backported, and
> > TESTED version, for 5.4.y and 4.19.y if anyone wants to see it there.
>
> This is a quick backport for 4.19 as the conflict seemed to be due to added
> code that is unrelated to this change. I built and booted it, but it should
> have more testing.
>
> Naresh, if you want this in 4.19, please run it through your tests and give
> your tested by.
>
> Greg, please do not take it until Naresh has tested it.
Below patch applied and tested on top of stable rc branches
- v4.19.296
- v5.4.258
Tested-by: Linux Kernel Functional Testing <lkft@...aro.org>
Tested-by: Naresh Kamboju <naresh.kamboju@...aro.org>
> diff --git a/drivers/cpuidle/cpuidle.c b/drivers/cpuidle/cpuidle.c
> index 2d182dc1b49e..01bde6dec13a 100644
> --- a/drivers/cpuidle/cpuidle.c
> +++ b/drivers/cpuidle/cpuidle.c
> @@ -140,13 +140,14 @@ static void enter_s2idle_proper(struct cpuidle_driver *drv,
> * executing it contains RCU usage regarded as invalid in the idle
> * context, so tell RCU about that.
> */
> - RCU_NONIDLE(tick_freeze());
> + tick_freeze();
> /*
> * The state used here cannot be a "coupled" one, because the "coupled"
> * cpuidle mechanism enables interrupts and doing that with timekeeping
> * suspended is generally unsafe.
> */
> stop_critical_timings();
> + rcu_idle_enter();
> drv->states[index].enter_s2idle(dev, drv, index);
> if (WARN_ON_ONCE(!irqs_disabled()))
> local_irq_disable();
> @@ -155,7 +156,8 @@ static void enter_s2idle_proper(struct cpuidle_driver *drv,
> * first CPU executing it calls functions containing RCU read-side
> * critical sections, so tell RCU about that.
> */
> - RCU_NONIDLE(tick_unfreeze());
> + rcu_idle_exit();
> + tick_unfreeze();
> start_critical_timings();
>
> time_end = ns_to_ktime(local_clock());
> @@ -224,16 +226,18 @@ int cpuidle_enter_state(struct cpuidle_device *dev, struct cpuidle_driver *drv,
> /* Take note of the planned idle state. */
> sched_idle_set_state(target_state);
>
> - trace_cpu_idle_rcuidle(index, dev->cpu);
> + trace_cpu_idle(index, dev->cpu);
> time_start = ns_to_ktime(local_clock());
>
> stop_critical_timings();
> + rcu_idle_enter();
> entered_state = target_state->enter(dev, drv, index);
> + rcu_idle_exit();
> start_critical_timings();
>
> sched_clock_idle_wakeup_event();
> time_end = ns_to_ktime(local_clock());
> - trace_cpu_idle_rcuidle(PWR_EVENT_EXIT, dev->cpu);
> + trace_cpu_idle(PWR_EVENT_EXIT, dev->cpu);
>
> /* The cpu is no longer idle or about to enter idle. */
> sched_idle_set_state(NULL);
> diff --git a/kernel/sched/idle.c b/kernel/sched/idle.c
> index 44a17366c8ec..4e3d149d64ad 100644
> --- a/kernel/sched/idle.c
> +++ b/kernel/sched/idle.c
> @@ -53,17 +53,18 @@ __setup("hlt", cpu_idle_nopoll_setup);
>
> static noinline int __cpuidle cpu_idle_poll(void)
> {
> + trace_cpu_idle(0, smp_processor_id());
> + stop_critical_timings();
> rcu_idle_enter();
> - trace_cpu_idle_rcuidle(0, smp_processor_id());
> local_irq_enable();
> - stop_critical_timings();
>
> while (!tif_need_resched() &&
> - (cpu_idle_force_poll || tick_check_broadcast_expired()))
> + (cpu_idle_force_poll || tick_check_broadcast_expired()))
> cpu_relax();
> - start_critical_timings();
> - trace_cpu_idle_rcuidle(PWR_EVENT_EXIT, smp_processor_id());
> +
> rcu_idle_exit();
> + start_critical_timings();
> + trace_cpu_idle(PWR_EVENT_EXIT, smp_processor_id());
>
> return 1;
> }
> @@ -90,7 +91,9 @@ void __cpuidle default_idle_call(void)
> local_irq_enable();
> } else {
> stop_critical_timings();
> + rcu_idle_enter();
> arch_cpu_idle();
> + rcu_idle_exit();
> start_critical_timings();
> }
> }
> @@ -148,7 +151,6 @@ static void cpuidle_idle_call(void)
>
> if (cpuidle_not_available(drv, dev)) {
> tick_nohz_idle_stop_tick();
> - rcu_idle_enter();
>
> default_idle_call();
> goto exit_idle;
> @@ -166,19 +168,15 @@ static void cpuidle_idle_call(void)
>
> if (idle_should_enter_s2idle() || dev->use_deepest_state) {
> if (idle_should_enter_s2idle()) {
> - rcu_idle_enter();
>
> entered_state = cpuidle_enter_s2idle(drv, dev);
> if (entered_state > 0) {
> local_irq_enable();
> goto exit_idle;
> }
> -
> - rcu_idle_exit();
> }
>
> tick_nohz_idle_stop_tick();
> - rcu_idle_enter();
>
> next_state = cpuidle_find_deepest_state(drv, dev);
> call_cpuidle(drv, dev, next_state);
> @@ -195,8 +193,6 @@ static void cpuidle_idle_call(void)
> else
> tick_nohz_idle_retain_tick();
>
> - rcu_idle_enter();
> -
> entered_state = call_cpuidle(drv, dev, next_state);
> /*
> * Give the governor an opportunity to reflect on the outcome
> @@ -212,8 +208,6 @@ static void cpuidle_idle_call(void)
> */
> if (WARN_ON_ONCE(irqs_disabled()))
> local_irq_enable();
> -
> - rcu_idle_exit();
> }
>
> /*
Powered by blists - more mailing lists