linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v3 12/25] security: Introduce inode_post

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <168dd7a1a1d6e5318b3d68e743ccaced54591ac7.camel@huaweicloud.com>
Date:   Thu, 12 Oct 2023 14:25:58 +0200
From:   Roberto Sassu <roberto.sassu@...weicloud.com>
To:     Mimi Zohar <zohar@...ux.ibm.com>, viro@...iv.linux.org.uk,
        brauner@...nel.org, chuck.lever@...cle.com, jlayton@...nel.org,
        neilb@...e.de, kolga@...app.com, Dai.Ngo@...cle.com,
        tom@...pey.com, dmitry.kasatkin@...il.com, paul@...l-moore.com,
        jmorris@...ei.org, serge@...lyn.com, dhowells@...hat.com,
        jarkko@...nel.org, stephen.smalley.work@...il.com,
        eparis@...isplace.org, casey@...aufler-ca.com
Cc:     linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-nfs@...r.kernel.org, linux-integrity@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-security-module@...r.kernel.org, keyrings@...r.kernel.org,
        selinux@...r.kernel.org, Roberto Sassu <roberto.sassu@...wei.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 12/25] security: Introduce inode_post_setattr hook

On Thu, 2023-10-12 at 07:43 -0400, Mimi Zohar wrote:
> On Thu, 2023-10-12 at 09:42 +0200, Roberto Sassu wrote:
> > On Wed, 2023-10-11 at 20:08 -0400, Mimi Zohar wrote:
> > > gOn Mon, 2023-09-04 at 15:34 +0200, Roberto Sassu wrote:
> > > > From: Roberto Sassu <roberto.sassu@...wei.com>
> > > > 
> > > > In preparation for moving IMA and EVM to the LSM infrastructure, introduce
> > > > the inode_post_setattr hook.
> > > > 
> > > > It is useful for EVM to recalculate the HMAC on modified file attributes
> > > > and other file metadata, after it verified the HMAC of current file
> > > > metadata with the inode_setattr hook.
> > > 
> > > "useful"?  
> > > 
> > > At inode_setattr hook, EVM verifies the file's existing HMAC value.  At
> > > inode_post_setattr, EVM re-calculates the file's HMAC based on the
> > > modified file attributes and other file metadata.
> > > 
> > > > 
> > > > LSMs should use the new hook instead of inode_setattr, when they need to
> > > > know that the operation was done successfully (not known in inode_setattr).
> > > > The new hook cannot return an error and cannot cause the operation to be
> > > > reverted.
> > > 
> > > Other LSMs could similarly update security xattrs or ...
> > 
> > I added your sentence. The one above is to satisfy Casey's request to
> > justify the addition of the new hook, and to explain why inode_setattr
> > is not sufficient.
> 
> I was suggesting simplifying the wording.  Perhaps something like:
> 
> Other LSMs could similarly take some action after successful file attri
> bute change.

Ok, will use that.

Thanks

Roberto