[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20231012134442.16f3f9f6@canb.auug.org.au>
Date: Thu, 12 Oct 2023 13:44:42 +1100
From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@...b.auug.org.au>
To: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>,
"H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>
Cc: Ard Biesheuvel <ardb@...nel.org>,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Linux Next Mailing List <linux-next@...r.kernel.org>,
"Russell King (Oracle)" <rmk+kernel@...linux.org.uk>
Subject: linux-next: manual merge of the tip tree with the asm-generic tree
Hi all,
Today's linux-next merge of the tip tree got a conflict in:
arch/ia64/include/asm/cpu.h
arch/ia64/kernel/topology.c
between commit:
cf8e8658100d ("arch: Remove Itanium (IA-64) architecture")
from the asm-generic tree and commit:
c4dd854f740c ("cpu-hotplug: Provide prototypes for arch CPU registration")
from the tip tree.
I fixed it up (I deleted the files) and can carry the fix as
necessary. This is now fixed as far as linux-next is concerned, but any
non trivial conflicts should be mentioned to your upstream maintainer
when your tree is submitted for merging. You may also want to consider
cooperating with the maintainer of the conflicting tree to minimise any
particularly complex conflicts.
--
Cheers,
Stephen Rothwell
Content of type "application/pgp-signature" skipped
Powered by blists - more mailing lists