lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <ZSmE6unIukqJ3GKu@Asurada-Nvidia>
Date:   Fri, 13 Oct 2023 10:56:58 -0700
From:   Nicolin Chen <nicolinc@...dia.com>
To:     Jason Gunthorpe <jgg@...dia.com>
CC:     Yi Liu <yi.l.liu@...el.com>, <joro@...tes.org>,
        <alex.williamson@...hat.com>, <kevin.tian@...el.com>,
        <robin.murphy@....com>, <baolu.lu@...ux.intel.com>,
        <cohuck@...hat.com>, <eric.auger@...hat.com>,
        <kvm@...r.kernel.org>, <mjrosato@...ux.ibm.com>,
        <chao.p.peng@...ux.intel.com>, <yi.y.sun@...ux.intel.com>,
        <peterx@...hat.com>, <jasowang@...hat.com>,
        <shameerali.kolothum.thodi@...wei.com>, <lulu@...hat.com>,
        <suravee.suthikulpanit@....com>, <iommu@...ts.linux.dev>,
        <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, <linux-kselftest@...r.kernel.org>,
        <zhenzhong.duan@...el.com>, <joao.m.martins@...cle.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 01/17] iommu: Add hwpt_type with user_data for
 domain_alloc_user op

On Fri, Oct 13, 2023 at 11:04:56AM -0300, Jason Gunthorpe wrote:
> On Fri, Oct 13, 2023 at 12:33:13PM +0800, Yi Liu wrote:
> 
> > not really. Below the users of the struct iommu_user_data in my current
> > iommufd_nesting branch. Only the domain_alloc_user op has type as there
> > can be multiple vendor specific alloc data types. Basically, I'm ok to
> > make the change you suggested, just not sure if it is good to add type
> > as it is only needed by one path.
> 
> I don't think we should ever have an opaque data blob without a type
> tag..

I can add those "missing" data types, and then a driver will be
responsible for sanitizing the type along with the data_len.

I notice that the enum iommu_hwpt_data_type in the posted patch
is confined to the alloc_user uAPI. Perhaps we should share it
with invalidate too:

/**
 * enum iommu_hwpt_data_type - IOMMU HWPT Data Type
 * @IOMMU_HWPT_DATA_NONE: no data
 * @IOMMU_HWPT_DATA_VTD_S1: Intel VT-d stage-1 page table
 * @IOMMU_HWPT_DATA_ARM_SMMUV3: ARM SMMUv3 Context Descriptor Table
 */
enum iommu_hwpt_data_type {
	IOMMU_HWPT_DATA_NONE,
	IOMMU_HWPT_DATA_VTD_S1,
	IOMMU_HWPT_DATA_ARM_SMMUV3,
};

Though inevitably we'd have to define a separate data group for
things like set_dev_data that is related to idev v.s. hwpt:

// IOMMU_DEV_DATA_TYPE sounds like an IOMMU device, other than a
// passthrough device, so renaming to "_IDEV_" here. And perhaps
// "set_dev_data" could be "set_idev_data" too? Any better name?

/**
 * enum iommu_idev_data_type - Data Type for a Device behind an IOMMU
 * @IOMMU_IDEV_DATA_NONE: no data
 * @IOMMU_IDEV_DATA_ARM_SMMUV3: ARM SMMUv3 specific device data
 */
enum iommu_idev_data_type {
	IOMMU_IDEV_DATA_NONE,
	IOMMU_IDEV_DATA_ARM_SMMUV3,
};

/**
 * struct iommu_idev_data_arm_smmuv3 - ARM SMMUv3 specific device data
 * @sid: The Stream ID that is assigned in the user space
 *
 * The SMMUv3 specific user space data for a device that is behind an SMMU HW.
 * The guest-level user data should be linked to the host-level kernel data,
 * which will be used by user space cache invalidation commands.
 */
struct iommu_idev_data_arm_smmuv3 {
	__u32 sid;
};

/**
 * struct iommu_set_idev_data - ioctl(IOMMU_SET_IDEV_DATA)
 * @size: sizeof(struct iommu_set_idev_data)
 * @dev_id: The device to set an iommu specific device data
 * @data_uptr: User pointer of the device user data
 * @data_len: Length of the device user data
 *
 * The device data must be unset using ioctl(IOMMU_UNSET_IDEV_DATA), before
 * another ioctl(IOMMU_SET_IDEV_DATA) call or before the device itself gets
 * unbind'd from the iommufd context.
 */
struct iommu_set_idev_data {
	__u32 size;
	__u32 dev_id;
	__aligned_u64 data_uptr;
	__u32 data_len;
};

Thanks
Nic

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ