linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v2] doc: blk-ioprio: Bring the doc in line with the implementation

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <2f4eb591-b275-42fd-900e-292d0f87dd9e@acm.org>
Date:   Fri, 13 Oct 2023 13:21:15 -0700
From:   Bart Van Assche <bvanassche@....org>
To:     Tang Yizhou <yizhou.tang@...pee.com>, houtao1@...wei.com,
        jack@...e.cz, kch@...dia.com
Cc:     axboe@...nel.dk, tj@...nel.org, corbet@....net,
        linux-block@...r.kernel.org, linux-doc@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, yingfu.zhou@...pee.com,
        chunguang.xu@...pee.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] doc: blk-ioprio: Bring the doc in line with the
 implementation

On 10/11/23 19:42, Tang Yizhou wrote:
> From: Tang Yizhou <yizhou.tang@...pee.com>
> 
> Our system administrator have noted that the names 'rt-to-be' and
> 'all-to-idle' in the I/O priority policies table appeared without
> explanations, leading to confusion. Let's bring these names in line
> with the naming in the 'attribute' section.
> 
> Additionally,
> 1. Correct the interface name to 'io.prio.class'.
> 2. Add a table entry of 'promote-to-rt' for consistency.
> 3. Fix a typo of 'priority'.
> 
> Suggested-by: Yingfu Zhou <yingfu.zhou@...pee.com>
> Reviewed-by: Hou Tao <houtao1@...wei.com>
> Signed-off-by: Tang Yizhou <yizhou.tang@...pee.com>
> ---
> v2:
> Accept Bart's suggestion and rename the title of the patch.
> Pick up Tao's Reviewed-by tag.

Thank you for having changed the patch subject.

Reviewed-by: Bart Van Assche <bvanassche@....org>