linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] dt-bindings: Drop kernel copy of common reserved-memory bindings

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <CAPnjgZ0Uh7RTvYfLjEL7g1NjC1pO8-xJuj9RBSVVnwviAwzF0Q@mail.gmail.com>
Date:   Fri, 13 Oct 2023 14:11:50 -0700
From:   Simon Glass <sjg@...omium.org>
To:     Rob Herring <robh@...nel.org>
Cc:     Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski+dt@...aro.org>,
        Conor Dooley <conor+dt@...nel.org>,
        Bjorn Andersson <andersson@...nel.org>,
        Mathieu Poirier <mathieu.poirier@...aro.org>,
        Liam Girdwood <lgirdwood@...il.com>,
        Mark Brown <broonie@...nel.org>,
        Matthias Brugger <matthias.bgg@...il.com>,
        AngeloGioacchino Del Regno 
        <angelogioacchino.delregno@...labora.com>,
        Geert Uytterhoeven <geert+renesas@...der.be>,
        Magnus Damm <magnus.damm@...il.com>,
        Julien Massot <julien.massot@....bzh>,
        Trevor Wu <trevor.wu@...iatek.com>, devicetree@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-remoteproc@...r.kernel.org,
        alsa-devel@...a-project.org, linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org,
        linux-mediatek@...ts.infradead.org,
        linux-renesas-soc@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] dt-bindings: Drop kernel copy of common reserved-memory bindings

On Fri, 13 Oct 2023 at 13:45, Rob Herring <robh@...nel.org> wrote:
>
> The common reserved-memory bindings have recently been copied from the
> kernel tree into dtschema. The preference is to host common, stable
> bindings in dtschema. As reserved-memory is documented in the DT Spec,
> it meets the criteria.
>
> The v2023.09 version of dtschema is what contains the reserved-memory
> schemas we depend on, so bump the minimum version to that. Otherwise,
> references to these schemas will generate errors.
>
> Signed-off-by: Rob Herring <robh@...nel.org>
> ---
>  Documentation/devicetree/bindings/Makefile    |   2 +-
>  .../remoteproc/renesas,rcar-rproc.yaml        |   2 +-
>  .../bindings/reserved-memory/framebuffer.yaml |  52 -----
>  .../reserved-memory/memory-region.yaml        |  40 ----
>  .../reserved-memory/reserved-memory.txt       |   2 +-
>  .../reserved-memory/reserved-memory.yaml      | 181 ------------------
>  .../reserved-memory/shared-dma-pool.yaml      |  97 ----------
>  .../bindings/sound/mediatek,mt8188-afe.yaml   |   2 +-
>  8 files changed, 4 insertions(+), 374 deletions(-)
>  delete mode 100644 Documentation/devicetree/bindings/reserved-memory/framebuffer.yaml
>  delete mode 100644 Documentation/devicetree/bindings/reserved-memory/memory-region.yaml
>  delete mode 100644 Documentation/devicetree/bindings/reserved-memory/reserved-memory.yaml
>  delete mode 100644 Documentation/devicetree/bindings/reserved-memory/shared-dma-pool.yaml
>

Reviewed-by: Simon Glass <sjg@...omium.org>