[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <0acbb031-a84e-1cbc-0857-f087b07a9056@amd.com>
Date: Fri, 13 Oct 2023 16:39:23 -0500
From: "Moger, Babu" <bmoger@....com>
To: Reinette Chatre <reinette.chatre@...el.com>,
Babu Moger <babu.moger@....com>, corbet@....net,
tglx@...utronix.de, mingo@...hat.com, bp@...en8.de
Cc: fenghua.yu@...el.com, dave.hansen@...ux.intel.com, x86@...nel.org,
hpa@...or.com, paulmck@...nel.org, akpm@...ux-foundation.org,
quic_neeraju@...cinc.com, rdunlap@...radead.org,
damien.lemoal@...nsource.wdc.com, songmuchun@...edance.com,
peterz@...radead.org, jpoimboe@...nel.org, pbonzini@...hat.com,
chang.seok.bae@...el.com, pawan.kumar.gupta@...ux.intel.com,
jmattson@...gle.com, daniel.sneddon@...ux.intel.com,
sandipan.das@....com, tony.luck@...el.com, james.morse@....com,
linux-doc@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
bagasdotme@...il.com, eranian@...gle.com,
christophe.leroy@...roup.eu, jarkko@...nel.org,
adrian.hunter@...el.com, quic_jiles@...cinc.com,
peternewman@...gle.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v13 04/10] x86/resctrl: Add comments on RFTYPE flags
hierarchy
Hi Reinette,
On 10/13/2023 4:23 PM, Reinette Chatre wrote:
> Hi Babu,
>
> On 10/13/2023 1:25 PM, Babu Moger wrote:
>> resctrl uses RFTYPE flags for creating resctrl directory structure.
>>
>> Definitions and directory structures are not documented. Add
>> comments to improve the readability and help future additions.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Babu Moger <babu.moger@....com>
>> ---
>> v13: Fixed the format issues in the documentation. Needed few minor format
>> changes to address the syntax issues.(Reinette)
>> Removed "Reviewed-by and Tested-by" flags as the patch has changed.
>>
>> v12: Moved the comments from arch/x86/kernel/cpu/resctrl/internal.h
>> to Documentation/arch/x86/resctrl.rst. (Boris)
>> ---
>> Documentation/arch/x86/resctrl.rst | 64 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
>> 1 file changed, 64 insertions(+)
>>
>> diff --git a/Documentation/arch/x86/resctrl.rst b/Documentation/arch/x86/resctrl.rst
>> index 178ab1d8f747..1163da74f734 100644
>> --- a/Documentation/arch/x86/resctrl.rst
>> +++ b/Documentation/arch/x86/resctrl.rst
>> @@ -369,6 +369,70 @@ When monitoring is enabled all MON groups will also contain:
>> the sum for all tasks in the CTRL_MON group and all tasks in
>> MON groups. Please see example section for more details on usage.
>>
>> +RESCTRL filesystem implementation notes
>> +=======================================
>> +RESCTRL filesystem has two main components
>> + a. info
>> + b. base
>> +
>> + /sys/fs/resctrl/
>> + |
>> + -> info
>> + |
>> + | (Top level directory named "info". Contains files that
>> + | provide details on control and monitoring resources")
>> + |
>> + -> base
>> +
> Could you please do a "make htmldocs" and then ensure that the output looks sane?
> The resulting output does not look right to me. For example, the above turns into
> a single line that looks like:
>
> /sys/fs/resctrl/ | -> info | | (Top level directory named "info". Contains files that | provide details on control and monitoring resources") | -> base
>
>
> The spacing also looks off when viewing this in html.
Yes. Messed up again. Thought fixing the syntax was enough. Will look
into this.
>
>> + (Root directory associated with default resource group as
>> + well as directories created by user for MON and CTRL groups.
>> + Contains files to interact with MON and CTRL groups)
>> +
>> + Note: resctrl uses flags for files, not for directories.
>> + Directories are created based on the resource type. Added
>> + directories below for better understanding. The RFTYPE flags
>> + are defined in arch/x86/kernel/cpu/resctrl/internal.h.
>> +
>> + info directory structure
>> +
> You removed the separator in order to pass the syntax issue but now there is
> no indication that this is a heading and the content becomes harder to understand.
Yes. I played with this little bit. Dont know how to make this look as
header. Will check it.
>
>> + -> RFTYPE_INFO
>> + Directory: info
>> +
>> + -> RFTYPE_TOP (Files in top level of info directory)
>> + File: last_cmd_status
>> +
>> + -> RFTYPE_MON (Files for all monitoring resources)
>> + Directory: L3_MON
>> + Files: mon_features, num_rmids
>> +
>> + -> RFTYPE_RES_CACHE (Files for cache monitoring resources)
>> + Directory: L3_MON
>> + Files: max_threshold_occupancy,
>> + mbm_total_bytes_config,
>> + mbm_local_bytes_config
>> +
>> + -> RFTYPE_CTRL (Files for all control resources)
>> + Directories: L2, L3, MB, SMBA, L2CODE, L2DATA, L3CODE, L3DATA
>> + File: num_closids
>> +
>> + -> RFTYPE_RES_CACHE (Files for cache control resources)
>> + Directories: L2, L3, L2CODE, L2DATA, L3CODE, L3DATA
>> + Files: bit_usage, cbm_mask, min_cbm_bits,
>> + shareable_bits
>> +
>> + -> RFTYPE_RES_MB (Files for memory control resources)
>> + Directories: MB, SMBA
>> + Files: bandwidth_gran, delay_linear,
>> + min_bandwidth, thread_throttle_mode
>> +
>> + base directory structure
>> +
> Same here.
Yes. Will check it.
thanks
Babu
Powered by blists - more mailing lists