[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <ZSjtpWukWHeZp///@ninjato>
Date: Fri, 13 Oct 2023 09:11:33 +0200
From: Wolfram Sang <wsa@...nel.org>
To: Andi Shyti <andi.shyti@...nel.org>
Cc: Chris Packham <chris.packham@...iedtelesis.co.nz>,
gregory.clement@...tlin.com, robh+dt@...nel.org,
krzysztof.kozlowski+dt@...aro.org, conor+dt@...nel.org,
pierre.gondois@....com, linux-i2c@...r.kernel.org,
devicetree@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 3/3] i2c: mv64xxx: add support for FSM based recovery
> mmmhhh... still a bit skeptical about waiting 100 times 10us in
> atomic.
Has it been discussed already why the non-atomic version of
read_poll_timeout is not enough?
Download attachment "signature.asc" of type "application/pgp-signature" (834 bytes)
Powered by blists - more mailing lists