lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:   Fri, 13 Oct 2023 10:59:15 +0900
From:   Masami Hiramatsu (Google) <mhiramat@...nel.org>
To:     "wuqiang.matt" <wuqiang.matt@...edance.com>
Cc:     linux-trace-kernel@...r.kernel.org, davem@...emloft.net,
        anil.s.keshavamurthy@...el.com, naveen.n.rao@...ux.ibm.com,
        rostedt@...dmis.org, peterz@...radead.org,
        akpm@...ux-foundation.org, sander@...nheule.net,
        ebiggers@...gle.com, dan.j.williams@...el.com, jpoimboe@...nel.org,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, lkp@...el.com, mattwu@....com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v9 1/5] lib: objpool added: ring-array based lockless
 MPMC

On Fri, 13 Oct 2023 01:36:05 +0800
"wuqiang.matt" <wuqiang.matt@...edance.com> wrote:

> On 2023/10/12 22:02, Masami Hiramatsu (Google) wrote:
> > Hi Wuqiang,
> > 
> > On Mon, 9 Oct 2023 17:23:34 +0800
> > wuqiang <wuqiang.matt@...edance.com> wrote:
> > 
> >> Hello Masami,
> >>
> >> Just got time for the new patch and got that ages[] was removed. ages[] is
> >> introduced the way like 2-phase commit to keep consitency and must be kept.
> >>
> >> Thinking of the following 2 cases that two cpu nodes are operating the same
> >> objpool_slot simultaneously:
> >>
> >> Case 1:
> >>
> >>     NODE 1:                  NODE 2:
> >>     push to an empty slot    pop will get wrong value
> >>
> >>     try_cmpxchg_acquire(&slot->tail, &tail, next)
> >>                              try_cmpxchg_release(&slot->head, &head, head + 1)
> >>                              return slot->entries[head & slot->mask]
> >>     WRITE_ONCE(slot->entries[tail & slot->mask], obj)
> > 
> > Today, I rethink the algorithm.
> > 
> > For this case, we can just add a `commit` to the slot for committing the tail
> > commit instead of the ages[].
> > 
> > CPU1                                       CPU2
> > push to an empty slot                      pop from the same slot
> > 
> > commit = tail = slot->tail;
> > next = tail + 1;
> > try_cmpxchg_acquire(&slot->tail,
> >                      &tail, next);
> >                                             while (head != commit) -> NG1
> > WRITE_ONCE(slot->entries[tail & slot->mask],
> >              obj)
> >                                             while (head != commit) -> NG2
> > WRITE_ONCE(&slot->commit, next);
> >                                             while (head != commit) -> OK
> >                                             try_cmpxchg_acquire(&slot->head,
> >                                                                 &head, next);
> >                                             return slot->entries[head & slot->mask]
> > 
> > So the NG1 and NG2 timing, the pop will fail.
> > 
> > This does not expect the nested "push" case because the reserve-commit block
> > will be interrupt disabled. This doesn't support NMI but that is OK.
> 
> If 2 push are performed in a row, slot->commit will be 'tail + 2', CPU2 won't
> meet the condition "head == commit".

No, it doesn't happen, because pop() may fetch the object from other's slot, but
push() only happens on its own slot. So push() on the same slot is never
in parallel.

> 
> Since slot->commit' is always synced to slot->tail after a successful push,
> should pop check "tail != commit" ?

No, pop() only need to check the "head != commit". If "head == commit", this slot
is empty or the slot owner is trying to push() (not committed yet).

> In this case when a push is ongoing with
> the slot, pop() has to wait for its completion even if there are objects in
> the same slot.

No, pop() will go to other slots to find available object.

> 
> > If we need to support such NMI or remove irq-disable, we can do following
> > (please remember the push operation only happens on the slot owned by that
> >   CPU. So this is per-cpu process)
> > 
> > ---
> > do {
> >    commit = tail = slot->tail;
> >    next = tail + 1;
> > } while (!try_cmpxchg_acquire(&slot->tail, &tail, next));
> > 
> > WRITE_ONCE(slot->entries[tail & slot->mask], obj);
> > 
> > // At this point, "commit == slot->tail - 1" in this nest level.
> > // Only outmost (non-nexted) case, "commit == slot->commit"
> > if (commit != slot->commit)
> >    return; // do nothing. it must be updated by outmost one.
> > 
> > // catch up commit to tail.
> > do {
> >    commit = READ_ONCE(slot->tail);
> >    WRITE_ONCE(slot->commit, commit);
> >     // note that someone can interrupt this loop too.
> > } while (commit != READ_ONCE(slot->tail));
> > ---
> 
> Yes, I got you: push can only happen on local node and the first try has the
> right to extend 'commit'. It does resolve nested push attempts, and preemption
> must be disabled.

Yes.

> 
> The overflow/ABA issue can still happen if the cpu is being interrupted for
> long time.

Yes, but ages[] also can not avoid that. (Note that head, tail and commit are
32bit counter, and per-cpu slot ring has enough big to store the pointer of
all objects.)

Thank you,

> 
> > For the rethook this may be too much.
> > 
> > Thank you,
> > 
> >>
> >>
> >> Case 2:
> >>
> >>     NODE 1:                  NODE 2
> >>     push to slot w/ 1 obj    pop will get wrong value
> >>
> >>                              try_cmpxchg_release(&slot->head, &head, head + 1)
> >>     try_cmpxchg_acquire(&slot->tail, &tail, next)
> >>     WRITE_ONCE(slot->entries[tail & slot->mask], obj)
> >>                              return slot->entries[head & slot->mask]
> 
> The pre-condition should be: CPU 1 tries to push to a full slot, in this case
> tail = head + capacity but tail & mask == head & mask
> 
> >>
> >> Regards,
> >> wuqiang
> >>
> >> On 2023/9/25 17:42, Masami Hiramatsu (Google) wrote:
> >>> Hi Wuqiang,
> >>>
> >>> On Tue,  5 Sep 2023 09:52:51 +0800
> >>> "wuqiang.matt" <wuqiang.matt@...edance.com> wrote:
> >>>
> >>>> The object pool is a scalable implementaion of high performance queue
> >>>> for object allocation and reclamation, such as kretprobe instances.
> >>>>
> >>>> With leveraging percpu ring-array to mitigate the hot spot of memory
> >>>> contention, it could deliver near-linear scalability for high parallel
> >>>> scenarios. The objpool is best suited for following cases:
> >>>> 1) Memory allocation or reclamation are prohibited or too expensive
> >>>> 2) Consumers are of different priorities, such as irqs and threads
> >>>>
> >>>> Limitations:
> >>>> 1) Maximum objects (capacity) is determined during pool initializing
> >>>>      and can't be modified (extended) after objpool creation
> >>>> 2) The memory of objects won't be freed until objpool is finalized
> >>>> 3) Object allocation (pop) may fail after trying all cpu slots
> >>>
> >>> I made a simplifying patch on this by (mainly) removing ages array.
> >>> I also rename local variable to use more readable names, like slot,
> >>> pool, and obj.
> >>>
> >>> Here the results which I run the test_objpool.ko.
> >>>
> >>> Original:
> >>> [   50.500235] Summary of testcases:
> >>> [   50.503139]     duration: 1027135us 	hits:   30628293 	miss:          0 	sync: percpu objpool
> >>> [   50.510416]     duration: 1047977us 	hits:   30453023 	miss:          0 	sync: percpu objpool from vmalloc
> >>> [   50.517421]     duration: 1047098us 	hits:   31145034 	miss:          0 	sync & hrtimer: percpu objpool
> >>> [   50.524671]     duration: 1053233us 	hits:   30919640 	miss:          0 	sync & hrtimer: percpu objpool from vmalloc
> >>> [   50.531382]     duration: 1055822us 	hits:    3407221 	miss:     830219 	sync overrun: percpu objpool
> >>> [   50.538135]     duration: 1055998us 	hits:    3404624 	miss:     854160 	sync overrun: percpu objpool from vmalloc
> >>> [   50.546686]     duration: 1046104us 	hits:   19464798 	miss:          0 	async: percpu objpool
> >>> [   50.552989]     duration: 1033054us 	hits:   18957836 	miss:          0 	async: percpu objpool from vmalloc
> >>> [   50.560289]     duration: 1041778us 	hits:   33806868 	miss:          0 	async & hrtimer: percpu objpool
> >>> [   50.567425]     duration: 1048901us 	hits:   34211860 	miss:          0 	async & hrtimer: percpu objpool from vmalloc
> >>>
> >>> Simplified:
> >>> [   48.393236] Summary of testcases:
> >>> [   48.395384]     duration: 1013002us 	hits:   29661448 	miss:          0 	sync: percpu objpool
> >>> [   48.400351]     duration: 1057231us 	hits:   31035578 	miss:          0 	sync: percpu objpool from vmalloc
> >>> [   48.405660]     duration: 1043196us 	hits:   30546652 	miss:          0 	sync & hrtimer: percpu objpool
> >>> [   48.411216]     duration: 1047128us 	hits:   30601306 	miss:          0 	sync & hrtimer: percpu objpool from vmalloc
> >>> [   48.417231]     duration: 1051695us 	hits:    3468287 	miss:     892881 	sync overrun: percpu objpool
> >>> [   48.422405]     duration: 1054003us 	hits:    3549491 	miss:     898141 	sync overrun: percpu objpool from vmalloc
> >>> [   48.428425]     duration: 1052946us 	hits:   19005228 	miss:          0 	async: percpu objpool
> >>> [   48.433597]     duration: 1051757us 	hits:   19670866 	miss:          0 	async: percpu objpool from vmalloc
> >>> [   48.439280]     duration: 1042951us 	hits:   37135332 	miss:          0 	async & hrtimer: percpu objpool
> >>> [   48.445085]     duration: 1029803us 	hits:   37093248 	miss:          0 	async & hrtimer: percpu objpool from vmalloc
> >>>
> >>> Can you test it too?
> >>>
> >>> Thanks,
> >>>
> >>>   From f1f442ff653e329839e5452b8b88463a80a12ff3 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
> >>> From: "Masami Hiramatsu (Google)" <mhiramat@...nel.org>
> >>> Date: Mon, 25 Sep 2023 16:07:12 +0900
> >>> Subject: [PATCH] objpool: Simplify objpool by removing ages array
> >>>
> >>> Simplify the objpool code by removing ages array from per-cpu slot.
> >>> It chooses enough big capacity (which is a rounded up power of 2 value
> >>> of nr_objects + 1) for the entries array, the tail never catch up to
> >>> the head in per-cpu slot. Thus tail == head means the slot is empty.
> >>>
> >>> This also uses consistent local variable names for pool, slot and obj.
> >>>
> >>> Signed-off-by: Masami Hiramatsu (Google) <mhiramat@...nel.org>
> >>> ---
> >>>    include/linux/objpool.h |  61 ++++----
> >>>    lib/objpool.c           | 310 ++++++++++++++++------------------------
> >>>    2 files changed, 147 insertions(+), 224 deletions(-)
> >>>
> >>> diff --git a/include/linux/objpool.h b/include/linux/objpool.h
> >>> index 33c832216b98..ecd5ecaffcd3 100644
> >>> --- a/include/linux/objpool.h
> >>> +++ b/include/linux/objpool.h
> >>> @@ -38,33 +38,23 @@
> >>>     * struct objpool_slot - percpu ring array of objpool
> >>>     * @head: head of the local ring array (to retrieve at)
> >>>     * @tail: tail of the local ring array (to append at)
> >>> - * @bits: log2 of capacity (for bitwise operations)
> >>> - * @mask: capacity - 1
> >>> + * @mask: capacity of entries - 1
> >>> + * @entries: object entries on this slot.
> >>>     *
> >>>     * Represents a cpu-local array-based ring buffer, its size is specialized
> >>>     * during initialization of object pool. The percpu objpool slot is to be
> >>>     * allocated from local memory for NUMA system, and to be kept compact in
> >>> - * continuous memory: ages[] is stored just after the body of objpool_slot,
> >>> - * and then entries[]. ages[] describes revision of each item, solely used
> >>> - * to avoid ABA; entries[] contains pointers of the actual objects
> >>> - *
> >>> - * Layout of objpool_slot in memory:
> >>> - *
> >>> - * 64bit:
> >>> - *        4      8      12     16        32                 64
> >>> - * | head | tail | bits | mask | ages[4] | ents[4]: (8 * 4) | objects
> >>> - *
> >>> - * 32bit:
> >>> - *        4      8      12     16        32        48       64
> >>> - * | head | tail | bits | mask | ages[4] | ents[4] | unused | objects
> >>> + * continuous memory: CPU assigned number of objects are stored just after
> >>> + * the body of objpool_slot.
> >>>     *
> >>>     */
> >>>    struct objpool_slot {
> >>> -	uint32_t                head;
> >>> -	uint32_t                tail;
> >>> -	uint32_t                bits;
> >>> -	uint32_t                mask;
> >>> -} __packed;
> >>> +	uint32_t	head;
> >>> +	uint32_t	tail;
> >>> +	uint32_t	mask;
> >>> +	uint32_t	dummyr;
> >>> +	void *		entries[];
> >>> +};
> >>>    
> >>>    struct objpool_head;
> >>>    
> >>> @@ -82,12 +72,11 @@ typedef int (*objpool_fini_cb)(struct objpool_head *head, void *context);
> >>>     * @obj_size:   object & element size
> >>>     * @nr_objs:    total objs (to be pre-allocated)
> >>>     * @nr_cpus:    nr_cpu_ids
> >>> - * @capacity:   max objects per cpuslot
> >>> + * @capacity:   max objects on percpu slot
> >>>     * @gfp:        gfp flags for kmalloc & vmalloc
> >>>     * @ref:        refcount for objpool
> >>>     * @flags:      flags for objpool management
> >>>     * @cpu_slots:  array of percpu slots
> >>> - * @slot_sizes:	size in bytes of slots
> >>>     * @release:    resource cleanup callback
> >>>     * @context:    caller-provided context
> >>>     */
> >>> @@ -100,7 +89,6 @@ struct objpool_head {
> >>>    	refcount_t              ref;
> >>>    	unsigned long           flags;
> >>>    	struct objpool_slot   **cpu_slots;
> >>> -	int                    *slot_sizes;
> >>>    	objpool_fini_cb         release;
> >>>    	void                   *context;
> >>>    };
> >>> @@ -108,9 +96,12 @@ struct objpool_head {
> >>>    #define OBJPOOL_FROM_VMALLOC	(0x800000000)	/* objpool allocated from vmalloc area */
> >>>    #define OBJPOOL_HAVE_OBJECTS	(0x400000000)	/* objects allocated along with objpool */
> >>>    
> >>> +#define OBJPOOL_NR_OBJECT_MAX	(1 << 24)
> >>> +#define OBJPOOL_OBJECT_SIZE_MAX	(1 << 16)
> >>> +
> >>>    /**
> >>>     * objpool_init() - initialize objpool and pre-allocated objects
> >>> - * @head:    the object pool to be initialized, declared by caller
> >>> + * @pool:    the object pool to be initialized, declared by caller
> >>>     * @nr_objs: total objects to be pre-allocated by this object pool
> >>>     * @object_size: size of an object (should be > 0)
> >>>     * @gfp:     flags for memory allocation (via kmalloc or vmalloc)
> >>> @@ -128,47 +119,47 @@ struct objpool_head {
> >>>     * pop (object allocation) or do clearance before each push (object
> >>>     * reclamation).
> >>>     */
> >>> -int objpool_init(struct objpool_head *head, int nr_objs, int object_size,
> >>> +int objpool_init(struct objpool_head *pool, int nr_objs, int object_size,
> >>>    		 gfp_t gfp, void *context, objpool_init_obj_cb objinit,
> >>>    		 objpool_fini_cb release);
> >>>    
> >>>    /**
> >>>     * objpool_pop() - allocate an object from objpool
> >>> - * @head: object pool
> >>> + * @pool: object pool
> >>>     *
> >>>     * return value: object ptr or NULL if failed
> >>>     */
> >>> -void *objpool_pop(struct objpool_head *head);
> >>> +void *objpool_pop(struct objpool_head *pool);
> >>>    
> >>>    /**
> >>>     * objpool_push() - reclaim the object and return back to objpool
> >>>     * @obj:  object ptr to be pushed to objpool
> >>> - * @head: object pool
> >>> + * @pool: object pool
> >>>     *
> >>>     * return: 0 or error code (it fails only when user tries to push
> >>>     * the same object multiple times or wrong "objects" into objpool)
> >>>     */
> >>> -int objpool_push(void *obj, struct objpool_head *head);
> >>> +int objpool_push(void *obj, struct objpool_head *pool);
> >>>    
> >>>    /**
> >>>     * objpool_drop() - discard the object and deref objpool
> >>>     * @obj:  object ptr to be discarded
> >>> - * @head: object pool
> >>> + * @pool: object pool
> >>>     *
> >>>     * return: 0 if objpool was released or error code
> >>>     */
> >>> -int objpool_drop(void *obj, struct objpool_head *head);
> >>> +int objpool_drop(void *obj, struct objpool_head *pool);
> >>>    
> >>>    /**
> >>>     * objpool_free() - release objpool forcely (all objects to be freed)
> >>> - * @head: object pool to be released
> >>> + * @pool: object pool to be released
> >>>     */
> >>> -void objpool_free(struct objpool_head *head);
> >>> +void objpool_free(struct objpool_head *pool);
> >>>    
> >>>    /**
> >>>     * objpool_fini() - deref object pool (also releasing unused objects)
> >>> - * @head: object pool to be dereferenced
> >>> + * @pool: object pool to be dereferenced
> >>>     */
> >>> -void objpool_fini(struct objpool_head *head);
> >>> +void objpool_fini(struct objpool_head *pool);
> >>>    
> >>>    #endif /* _LINUX_OBJPOOL_H */
> >>> diff --git a/lib/objpool.c b/lib/objpool.c
> >>> index 22e752371820..f8e8f70d7253 100644
> >>> --- a/lib/objpool.c
> >>> +++ b/lib/objpool.c
> >>> @@ -15,104 +15,55 @@
> >>>     * Copyright: wuqiang.matt@...edance.com
> >>>     */
> >>>    
> >>> -#define SLOT_AGES(s) ((uint32_t *)((char *)(s) + sizeof(struct objpool_slot)))
> >>> -#define SLOT_ENTS(s) ((void **)((char *)(s) + sizeof(struct objpool_slot) + \
> >>> -			(sizeof(uint32_t) << (s)->bits)))
> >>> -#define SLOT_OBJS(s) ((void *)((char *)(s) + sizeof(struct objpool_slot) + \
> >>> -			((sizeof(uint32_t) + sizeof(void *)) << (s)->bits)))
> >>> -#define SLOT_CORE(n) cpumask_nth((n) % num_possible_cpus(), cpu_possible_mask)
> >>> -
> >>> -/* compute the suitable num of objects to be managed per slot */
> >>> -static int objpool_nobjs(int size)
> >>> -{
> >>> -	return rounddown_pow_of_two((size - sizeof(struct objpool_slot)) /
> >>> -			(sizeof(uint32_t) + sizeof(void *)));
> >>> -}
> >>> -
> >>>    /* allocate and initialize percpu slots */
> >>>    static int
> >>> -objpool_init_percpu_slots(struct objpool_head *head, int nobjs,
> >>> -			void *context, objpool_init_obj_cb objinit)
> >>> +objpool_init_percpu_slots(struct objpool_head *pool, void *context,
> >>> +			  objpool_init_obj_cb objinit)
> >>>    {
> >>> -	int i, j, n, size, objsz, cpu = 0, nents = head->capacity;
> >>> -
> >>> -	/* aligned object size by sizeof(void *) */
> >>> -	objsz = ALIGN(head->obj_size, sizeof(void *));
> >>> -	/* shall we allocate objects along with percpu-slot */
> >>> -	if (objsz)
> >>> -		head->flags |= OBJPOOL_HAVE_OBJECTS;
> >>> -
> >>> -	/* vmalloc is used in default to allocate percpu-slots */
> >>> -	if (!(head->gfp & GFP_ATOMIC))
> >>> -		head->flags |= OBJPOOL_FROM_VMALLOC;
> >>> -
> >>> -	for (i = 0; i < head->nr_cpus; i++) {
> >>> -		struct objpool_slot *os;
> >>> +	int i, j, n, size, slot_size, cpu_count = 0;
> >>> +	struct objpool_slot *slot;
> >>>    
> >>> +	for (i = 0; i < pool->nr_cpus; i++) {
> >>>    		/* skip the cpus which could never be present */
> >>>    		if (!cpu_possible(i))
> >>>    			continue;
> >>>    
> >>>    		/* compute how many objects to be managed by this slot */
> >>> -		n = nobjs / num_possible_cpus();
> >>> -		if (cpu < (nobjs % num_possible_cpus()))
> >>> +		n = pool->nr_objs / num_possible_cpus();
> >>> +		if (cpu_count < (pool->nr_objs % num_possible_cpus()))
> >>>    			n++;
> >>> -		size = sizeof(struct objpool_slot) + sizeof(void *) * nents +
> >>> -		       sizeof(uint32_t) * nents + objsz * n;
> >>> +		cpu_count++;
> >>> +
> >>> +		slot_size = struct_size(slot, entries, pool->capacity);
> >>> +		size = slot_size + pool->obj_size * n;
> >>>    
> >>>    		/*
> >>>    		 * here we allocate percpu-slot & objects together in a single
> >>> -		 * allocation, taking advantage of warm caches and TLB hits as
> >>> -		 * vmalloc always aligns the request size to pages
> >>> +		 * allocation, taking advantage on NUMA.
> >>>    		 */
> >>> -		if (head->flags & OBJPOOL_FROM_VMALLOC)
> >>> -			os = __vmalloc_node(size, sizeof(void *), head->gfp,
> >>> +		if (pool->flags & OBJPOOL_FROM_VMALLOC)
> >>> +			slot = __vmalloc_node(size, sizeof(void *), pool->gfp,
> >>>    				cpu_to_node(i), __builtin_return_address(0));
> >>>    		else
> >>> -			os = kmalloc_node(size, head->gfp, cpu_to_node(i));
> >>> -		if (!os)
> >>> +			slot = kmalloc_node(size, pool->gfp, cpu_to_node(i));
> >>> +		if (!slot)
> >>>    			return -ENOMEM;
> >>>    
> >>>    		/* initialize percpu slot for the i-th slot */
> >>> -		memset(os, 0, size);
> >>> -		os->bits = ilog2(head->capacity);
> >>> -		os->mask = head->capacity - 1;
> >>> -		head->cpu_slots[i] = os;
> >>> -		head->slot_sizes[i] = size;
> >>> -		cpu = cpu + 1;
> >>> -
> >>> -		/*
> >>> -		 * manually set head & tail to avoid possible conflict:
> >>> -		 * We assume that the head item is ready for retrieval
> >>> -		 * iff head is equal to ages[head & mask]. but ages is
> >>> -		 * initialized as 0, so in view of the caller of pop(),
> >>> -		 * the 1st item (0th) is always ready, but the reality
> >>> -		 * could be: push() is stalled before the final update,
> >>> -		 * thus the item being inserted will be lost forever
> >>> -		 */
> >>> -		os->head = os->tail = head->capacity;
> >>> -
> >>> -		if (!objsz)
> >>> -			continue;
> >>> +		memset(slot, 0, size);
> >>> +		slot->mask = pool->capacity - 1;
> >>> +		pool->cpu_slots[i] = slot;
> >>>    
> >>>    		for (j = 0; j < n; j++) {
> >>> -			uint32_t *ages = SLOT_AGES(os);
> >>> -			void **ents = SLOT_ENTS(os);
> >>> -			void *obj = SLOT_OBJS(os) + j * objsz;
> >>> -			uint32_t ie = os->tail & os->mask;
> >>> +			void *obj = (void *)slot + slot_size + pool->obj_size * j;
> >>>    
> >>> -			/* perform object initialization */
> >>>    			if (objinit) {
> >>>    				int rc = objinit(obj, context);
> >>>    				if (rc)
> >>>    					return rc;
> >>>    			}
> >>> -
> >>> -			/* add obj into the ring array */
> >>> -			ents[ie] = obj;
> >>> -			ages[ie] = os->tail;
> >>> -			os->tail++;
> >>> -			head->nr_objs++;
> >>> +			slot->entries[j] = obj;
> >>> +			slot->tail++;
> >>>    		}
> >>>    	}
> >>>    
> >>> @@ -120,164 +71,135 @@ objpool_init_percpu_slots(struct objpool_head *head, int nobjs,
> >>>    }
> >>>    
> >>>    /* cleanup all percpu slots of the object pool */
> >>> -static void objpool_fini_percpu_slots(struct objpool_head *head)
> >>> +static void objpool_fini_percpu_slots(struct objpool_head *pool)
> >>>    {
> >>>    	int i;
> >>>    
> >>> -	if (!head->cpu_slots)
> >>> +	if (!pool->cpu_slots)
> >>>    		return;
> >>>    
> >>> -	for (i = 0; i < head->nr_cpus; i++) {
> >>> -		if (!head->cpu_slots[i])
> >>> -			continue;
> >>> -		if (head->flags & OBJPOOL_FROM_VMALLOC)
> >>> -			vfree(head->cpu_slots[i]);
> >>> -		else
> >>> -			kfree(head->cpu_slots[i]);
> >>> -	}
> >>> -	kfree(head->cpu_slots);
> >>> -	head->cpu_slots = NULL;
> >>> -	head->slot_sizes = NULL;
> >>> +	for (i = 0; i < pool->nr_cpus; i++)
> >>> +		kvfree(pool->cpu_slots[i]);
> >>> +	kfree(pool->cpu_slots);
> >>>    }
> >>>    
> >>>    /* initialize object pool and pre-allocate objects */
> >>> -int objpool_init(struct objpool_head *head, int nr_objs, int object_size,
> >>> +int objpool_init(struct objpool_head *pool, int nr_objs, int object_size,
> >>>    		gfp_t gfp, void *context, objpool_init_obj_cb objinit,
> >>>    		objpool_fini_cb release)
> >>>    {
> >>>    	int nents, rc;
> >>>    
> >>>    	/* check input parameters */
> >>> -	if (nr_objs <= 0 || object_size <= 0)
> >>> +	if (nr_objs <= 0 || object_size <= 0 ||
> >>> +	    nr_objs > OBJPOOL_NR_OBJECT_MAX || object_size > OBJPOOL_OBJECT_SIZE_MAX)
> >>> +		return -EINVAL;
> >>> +
> >>> +	/* Align up to unsigned long size */
> >>> +	object_size = ALIGN(object_size, sizeof(unsigned long));
> >>> +
> >>> +	/*
> >>> +	 * To avoid filling up the entries array in the per-cpu slot,
> >>> +	 * use the power of 2 which is more than N + 1. Thus, the tail never
> >>> +	 * catch up to the pool, and able to use pool/tail as the sequencial
> >>> +	 * number.
> >>> +	 */
> >>> +	nents = roundup_pow_of_two(nr_objs + 1);
> >>> +	if (!nents)
> >>>    		return -EINVAL;
> >>>    
> >>> -	/* calculate percpu slot size (rounded to pow of 2) */
> >>> -	nents = max_t(int, roundup_pow_of_two(nr_objs),
> >>> -			objpool_nobjs(L1_CACHE_BYTES));
> >>> -
> >>> -	/* initialize objpool head */
> >>> -	memset(head, 0, sizeof(struct objpool_head));
> >>> -	head->nr_cpus = nr_cpu_ids;
> >>> -	head->obj_size = object_size;
> >>> -	head->capacity = nents;
> >>> -	head->gfp = gfp & ~__GFP_ZERO;
> >>> -	head->context = context;
> >>> -	head->release = release;
> >>> -
> >>> -	/* allocate array for percpu slots */
> >>> -	head->cpu_slots = kzalloc(head->nr_cpus * sizeof(void *) +
> >>> -			       head->nr_cpus * sizeof(int), head->gfp);
> >>> -	if (!head->cpu_slots)
> >>> +	/* initialize objpool pool */
> >>> +	memset(pool, 0, sizeof(struct objpool_head));
> >>> +	pool->nr_cpus = nr_cpu_ids;
> >>> +	pool->obj_size = object_size;
> >>> +	pool->nr_objs = nr_objs;
> >>> +	/* just prevent to fullfill the per-cpu ring array */
> >>> +	pool->capacity = nents;
> >>> +	pool->gfp = gfp & ~__GFP_ZERO;
> >>> +	pool->context = context;
> >>> +	pool->release = release;
> >>> +	/* vmalloc is used in default to allocate percpu-slots */
> >>> +	if (!(pool->gfp & GFP_ATOMIC))
> >>> +		pool->flags |= OBJPOOL_FROM_VMALLOC;
> >>> +
> >>> +	pool->cpu_slots = kzalloc(pool->nr_cpus * sizeof(void *), pool->gfp);
> >>> +	if (!pool->cpu_slots)
> >>>    		return -ENOMEM;
> >>> -	head->slot_sizes = (int *)&head->cpu_slots[head->nr_cpus];
> >>>    
> >>>    	/* initialize per-cpu slots */
> >>> -	rc = objpool_init_percpu_slots(head, nr_objs, context, objinit);
> >>> +	rc = objpool_init_percpu_slots(pool, context, objinit);
> >>>    	if (rc)
> >>> -		objpool_fini_percpu_slots(head);
> >>> +		objpool_fini_percpu_slots(pool);
> >>>    	else
> >>> -		refcount_set(&head->ref, nr_objs + 1);
> >>> +		refcount_set(&pool->ref, nr_objs + 1);
> >>>    
> >>>    	return rc;
> >>>    }
> >>>    EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(objpool_init);
> >>>    
> >>>    /* adding object to slot, abort if the slot was already full */
> >>> -static inline int objpool_try_add_slot(void *obj, struct objpool_slot *os)
> >>> +static inline int objpool_try_add_slot(void *obj, struct objpool_head *pool, int cpu)
> >>>    {
> >>> -	uint32_t *ages = SLOT_AGES(os);
> >>> -	void **ents = SLOT_ENTS(os);
> >>> -	uint32_t head, tail;
> >>> +	struct objpool_slot *slot = pool->cpu_slots[cpu];
> >>> +	uint32_t tail, next;
> >>>    
> >>>    	do {
> >>> -		/* perform memory loading for both head and tail */
> >>> -		head = READ_ONCE(os->head);
> >>> -		tail = READ_ONCE(os->tail);
> >>> -		/* just abort if slot is full */
> >>> -		if (tail - head > os->mask)
> >>> -			return -ENOENT;
> >>> -		/* try to extend tail by 1 using CAS to avoid races */
> >>> -		if (try_cmpxchg_acquire(&os->tail, &tail, tail + 1))
> >>> -			break;
> >>> -	} while (1);
> >>> +		uint32_t head = READ_ONCE(slot->head);
> >>>    
> >>> -	/* the tail-th of slot is reserved for the given obj */
> >>> -	WRITE_ONCE(ents[tail & os->mask], obj);
> >>> -	/* update epoch id to make this object available for pop() */
> >>> -	smp_store_release(&ages[tail & os->mask], tail);
> >>> +		tail = READ_ONCE(slot->tail);
> >>> +		next = tail + 1;
> >>> +
> >>> +		/* This must never happen because capacity >= N + 1 */
> >>> +		if (WARN_ON_ONCE((next > head && next - head > pool->nr_objs) ||
> >>> +				 (next < head && next > head + pool->nr_objs)))
> >>> +			return -EINVAL;
> >>> +
> >>> +	} while (!try_cmpxchg_acquire(&slot->tail, &tail, next));
> >>> +
> >>> +	WRITE_ONCE(slot->entries[tail & slot->mask], obj);
> >>>    	return 0;
> >>>    }
> >>>    
> >>>    /* reclaim an object to object pool */
> >>> -int objpool_push(void *obj, struct objpool_head *oh)
> >>> +int objpool_push(void *obj, struct objpool_head *pool)
> >>>    {
> >>>    	unsigned long flags;
> >>> -	int cpu, rc;
> >>> +	int rc;
> >>>    
> >>>    	/* disable local irq to avoid preemption & interruption */
> >>>    	raw_local_irq_save(flags);
> >>> -	cpu = raw_smp_processor_id();
> >>> -	do {
> >>> -		rc = objpool_try_add_slot(obj, oh->cpu_slots[cpu]);
> >>> -		if (!rc)
> >>> -			break;
> >>> -		cpu = cpumask_next_wrap(cpu, cpu_possible_mask, -1, 1);
> >>> -	} while (1);
> >>> +	rc = objpool_try_add_slot(obj, pool, raw_smp_processor_id());
> >>>    	raw_local_irq_restore(flags);
> >>>    
> >>>    	return rc;
> >>>    }
> >>>    EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(objpool_push);
> >>>    
> >>> -/* drop the allocated object, rather reclaim it to objpool */
> >>> -int objpool_drop(void *obj, struct objpool_head *head)
> >>> -{
> >>> -	if (!obj || !head)
> >>> -		return -EINVAL;
> >>> -
> >>> -	if (refcount_dec_and_test(&head->ref)) {
> >>> -		objpool_free(head);
> >>> -		return 0;
> >>> -	}
> >>> -
> >>> -	return -EAGAIN;
> >>> -}
> >>> -EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(objpool_drop);
> >>> -
> >>>    /* try to retrieve object from slot */
> >>> -static inline void *objpool_try_get_slot(struct objpool_slot *os)
> >>> +static inline void *objpool_try_get_slot(struct objpool_slot *slot)
> >>>    {
> >>> -	uint32_t *ages = SLOT_AGES(os);
> >>> -	void **ents = SLOT_ENTS(os);
> >>>    	/* do memory load of head to local head */
> >>> -	uint32_t head = smp_load_acquire(&os->head);
> >>> +	uint32_t head = smp_load_acquire(&slot->head);
> >>>    
> >>>    	/* loop if slot isn't empty */
> >>> -	while (head != READ_ONCE(os->tail)) {
> >>> -		uint32_t id = head & os->mask, prev = head;
> >>> +	while (head != READ_ONCE(slot->tail)) {
> >>>    
> >>>    		/* do prefetching of object ents */
> >>> -		prefetch(&ents[id]);
> >>> -
> >>> -		/* check whether this item was ready for retrieval */
> >>> -		if (smp_load_acquire(&ages[id]) == head) {
> >>> -			/* node must have been udpated by push() */
> >>> -			void *node = READ_ONCE(ents[id]);
> >>> -			/* commit and move forward head of the slot */
> >>> -			if (try_cmpxchg_release(&os->head, &head, head + 1))
> >>> -				return node;
> >>> -			/* head was already updated by others */
> >>> -		}
> >>> +		prefetch(&slot->entries[head & slot->mask]);
> >>> +
> >>> +		/* commit and move forward head of the slot */
> >>> +		if (try_cmpxchg_release(&slot->head, &head, head + 1))
> >>> +			/*
> >>> +			 * TBD: check overwrap the tail/head counter and warn
> >>> +			 * if it is broken. But this happens only if this
> >>> +			 * process slows down a lot and another CPU updates
> >>> +			 * the haed/tail just 2^32 + 1 times, and this slot
> >>> +			 * is empty.
> >>> +			 */
> >>> +			return slot->entries[head & slot->mask];
> >>>    
> >>>    		/* re-load head from memory and continue trying */
> >>> -		head = READ_ONCE(os->head);
> >>> -		/*
> >>> -		 * head stays unchanged, so it's very likely there's an
> >>> -		 * ongoing push() on other cpu nodes but yet not update
> >>> -		 * ages[] to mark it's completion
> >>> -		 */
> >>> -		if (head == prev)
> >>> -			break;
> >>> +		head = READ_ONCE(slot->head);
> >>>    	}
> >>>    
> >>>    	return NULL;
> >>> @@ -307,32 +229,42 @@ void *objpool_pop(struct objpool_head *head)
> >>>    EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(objpool_pop);
> >>>    
> >>>    /* release whole objpool forcely */
> >>> -void objpool_free(struct objpool_head *head)
> >>> +void objpool_free(struct objpool_head *pool)
> >>>    {
> >>> -	if (!head->cpu_slots)
> >>> +	if (!pool->cpu_slots)
> >>>    		return;
> >>>    
> >>>    	/* release percpu slots */
> >>> -	objpool_fini_percpu_slots(head);
> >>> +	objpool_fini_percpu_slots(pool);
> >>>    
> >>>    	/* call user's cleanup callback if provided */
> >>> -	if (head->release)
> >>> -		head->release(head, head->context);
> >>> +	if (pool->release)
> >>> +		pool->release(pool, pool->context);
> >>>    }
> >>>    EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(objpool_free);
> >>>    
> >>> -/* drop unused objects and defref objpool for releasing */
> >>> -void objpool_fini(struct objpool_head *head)
> >>> +/* drop the allocated object, rather reclaim it to objpool */
> >>> +int objpool_drop(void *obj, struct objpool_head *pool)
> >>>    {
> >>> -	void *nod;
> >>> +	if (!obj || !pool)
> >>> +		return -EINVAL;
> >>>    
> >>> -	do {
> >>> -		/* grab object from objpool and drop it */
> >>> -		nod = objpool_pop(head);
> >>> +	if (refcount_dec_and_test(&pool->ref)) {
> >>> +		objpool_free(pool);
> >>> +		return 0;
> >>> +	}
> >>> +
> >>> +	return -EAGAIN;
> >>> +}
> >>> +EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(objpool_drop);
> >>> +
> >>> +/* drop unused objects and defref objpool for releasing */
> >>> +void objpool_fini(struct objpool_head *pool)
> >>> +{
> >>> +	void *obj;
> >>>    
> >>> -		/* drop the extra ref of objpool */
> >>> -		if (refcount_dec_and_test(&head->ref))
> >>> -			objpool_free(head);
> >>> -	} while (nod);
> >>> +	/* grab object from objpool and drop it */
> >>> +	while ((obj = objpool_pop(pool)))
> >>> +		objpool_drop(obj, pool);
> >>>    }
> >>>    EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(objpool_fini);
> >>
> > 
> > 
> 


-- 
Masami Hiramatsu (Google) <mhiramat@...nel.org>

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ