linux-kernel - Re: linux-next: duplicate patch in the pinctrl tree

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <CACRpkdZPOoGkauvQkozp-B3Vi3J7Z8eNvncRYOpF9zMmMyXt5A@mail.gmail.com>
Date:   Fri, 13 Oct 2023 10:58:55 +0200
From:   Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@...aro.org>
To:     Geert Uytterhoeven <geert@...ux-m68k.org>
Cc:     Stephen Rothwell <sfr@...b.auug.org.au>,
        Ralph Siemsen <ralph.siemsen@...aro.org>,
        Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        Linux Next Mailing List <linux-next@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: linux-next: duplicate patch in the pinctrl tree

On Fri, Oct 13, 2023 at 9:37 AM Geert Uytterhoeven <geert@...ux-m68k.org> wrote:


> > > The only difference is your added SoB?
> >
> > No, I'm not that vain...
>
> I don't see any other difference, though:

The difference is not in the commit, the difference is that the merge
commit is not
there, so it is a commit on top of my pile instead of v6.6-rc.

Yours,
Linus Walleij