linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH RESEND v11 0/5] Enable Display for J784S4 and AM69-SK platform

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <063395d4-16e5-8a56-1da3-5a04af3cdbce@ti.com>
Date:   Fri, 13 Oct 2023 14:38:30 +0530
From:   Aradhya Bhatia <a-bhatia1@...com>
To:     Vignesh Raghavendra <vigneshr@...com>,
        Jayesh Choudhary <j-choudhary@...com>, <nm@...com>
CC:     <afd@...com>, <rogerq@...nel.org>, <s-vadapalli@...com>,
        <conor+dt@...nel.org>, <r-ravikumar@...com>, <sabiya.d@...com>,
        <kristo@...nel.org>, <robh+dt@...nel.org>,
        <krzysztof.kozlowski+dt@...aro.org>, <devicetree@...r.kernel.org>,
        <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        <linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH RESEND v11 0/5] Enable Display for J784S4 and AM69-SK
 platform



On 13/10/23 10:31, Vignesh Raghavendra wrote:
> 
> 
> On 05/10/23 18:57, Jayesh Choudhary wrote:
>> This series adds support for:
>> - DisplayPort for J784S4-EVM
>> - Displayport and HDMI for AM69-SK platform
>>
>> NOTE: Patch 4/5 introduces the following dtc warning which can be ignored
>> since its behind W=1 check:
>> Warning (graph_child_address): /bus@...000/dss@...0000/ports: graph node
>> has single child node 'port@0', #address-cells/#size-cells are not
>> necessary
>>> (This is more accurate description for port and the dtc check should not
>> differentiate between port@0 and port@1.[0])
>>
> 
> Sorry, don't want to more warnings to the file while we are working
> constantly to reduce warnings on the other side. There are 3 options
> 
> a) Propose fix to dtc
> b) Minimally describe second port (DSI) and it keep disabled as its
> unusable currently (this more closely describes the HW and the reason
> why port indexing is needed in first place)
> c) Go back to v9 and describe second port once DSI supported is added in
> future,
> 
> [...]
> 

Posted a fix for the warning here,

https://lore.kernel.org/all/20231013085424.7137-1-a-bhatia1@ti.com/

Regards
Aradhya