| lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
|
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Message-ID: <CAEf4BzbPMWy4Zxg6Tc-qcWjncW6qK+G=i0wC+nd0MLXiSMiBig@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 12 Oct 2023 19:25:34 -0700
From: Andrii Nakryiko <andrii.nakryiko@...il.com>
To: zhujun2 <zhujun2@...s.chinamobile.com>
Cc: shuah@...nel.org, ast@...nel.org, daniel@...earbox.net,
bpf@...r.kernel.org, linux-kselftest@...r.kernel.org,
andrii@...nel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] selftests: bpf: remove unused variables
On Thu, Oct 12, 2023 at 6:35 PM zhujun2 <zhujun2@...s.chinamobile.com> wrote:
>
> These variables are never referenced in the code, just remove them.
>
> Signed-off-by: zhujun2 <zhujun2@...s.chinamobile.com>
> ---
Why do you stubbornly keep submitting the same untested and broken
patch, ignoring the feedback ([0])? Your changes don't even compile
successfully ([1]).
[0] https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/2e4c17ac-9a61-4901-8f98-c783242eec28@iogearbox.net/
[1] https://github.com/kernel-patches/bpf/actions/runs/6502998724/job/17662867681
> tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/atomic_bounds.c | 1 -
> tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/kfree_skb.c | 2 --
> tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/perf_branches.c | 6 +-----
> .../testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/probe_read_user_str.c | 4 ++--
> tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/test_overhead.c | 4 ++--
> tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/xdp_synproxy.c | 1 -
> 6 files changed, 5 insertions(+), 13 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/atomic_bounds.c b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/atomic_bounds.c
> index 69bd7853e..4715cde38 100644
> --- a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/atomic_bounds.c
> +++ b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/atomic_bounds.c
> @@ -7,7 +7,6 @@
> void test_atomic_bounds(void)
> {
> struct atomic_bounds *skel;
> - __u32 duration = 0;
>
> skel = atomic_bounds__open_and_load();
> if (CHECK(!skel, "skel_load", "couldn't load program\n"))
> diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/kfree_skb.c b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/kfree_skb.c
> index c07991544..b0992a9ed 100644
> --- a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/kfree_skb.c
> +++ b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/kfree_skb.c
> @@ -20,7 +20,6 @@ static void on_sample(void *ctx, int cpu, void *data, __u32 size)
> {
> struct meta *meta = (struct meta *)data;
> struct ipv6_packet *pkt_v6 = data + sizeof(*meta);
> - int duration = 0;
>
> if (CHECK(size != 72 + sizeof(*meta), "check_size", "size %u != %zu\n",
> size, 72 + sizeof(*meta)))
> @@ -65,7 +64,6 @@ void serial_test_kfree_skb(void)
> struct perf_buffer *pb = NULL;
> int err, prog_fd;
> bool passed = false;
> - __u32 duration = 0;
> const int zero = 0;
> bool test_ok[2];
>
> diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/perf_branches.c b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/perf_branches.c
> index bc24f8333..0942b9891 100644
> --- a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/perf_branches.c
> +++ b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/perf_branches.c
> @@ -13,7 +13,6 @@ static void check_good_sample(struct test_perf_branches *skel)
> int required_size = skel->bss->required_size_out;
> int written_stack = skel->bss->written_stack_out;
> int pbe_size = sizeof(struct perf_branch_entry);
> - int duration = 0;
>
> if (CHECK(!skel->bss->valid, "output not valid",
> "no valid sample from prog"))
> @@ -43,7 +42,6 @@ static void check_bad_sample(struct test_perf_branches *skel)
> int written_global = skel->bss->written_global_out;
> int required_size = skel->bss->required_size_out;
> int written_stack = skel->bss->written_stack_out;
> - int duration = 0;
>
> if (CHECK(!skel->bss->valid, "output not valid",
> "no valid sample from prog"))
> @@ -61,7 +59,7 @@ static void test_perf_branches_common(int perf_fd,
> void (*cb)(struct test_perf_branches *))
> {
> struct test_perf_branches *skel;
> - int err, i, duration = 0;
> + int err, i;
> bool detached = false;
> struct bpf_link *link;
> volatile int j = 0;
> @@ -102,7 +100,6 @@ static void test_perf_branches_common(int perf_fd,
> static void test_perf_branches_hw(void)
> {
> struct perf_event_attr attr = {0};
> - int duration = 0;
> int pfd;
>
> /* create perf event */
> @@ -143,7 +140,6 @@ static void test_perf_branches_hw(void)
> static void test_perf_branches_no_hw(void)
> {
> struct perf_event_attr attr = {0};
> - int duration = 0;
> int pfd;
>
> /* create perf event */
> diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/probe_read_user_str.c b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/probe_read_user_str.c
> index e41929813..a7c6ad8d6 100644
> --- a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/probe_read_user_str.c
> +++ b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/probe_read_user_str.c
> @@ -9,7 +9,7 @@ static const char str3[] = "mestringblubblubblubblubblub";
> static int test_one_str(struct test_probe_read_user_str *skel, const char *str,
> size_t len)
> {
> - int err, duration = 0;
> + int err;
> char buf[256];
>
> /* Ensure bytes after string are ones */
> @@ -44,7 +44,7 @@ static int test_one_str(struct test_probe_read_user_str *skel, const char *str,
> void test_probe_read_user_str(void)
> {
> struct test_probe_read_user_str *skel;
> - int err, duration = 0;
> + int err;
>
> skel = test_probe_read_user_str__open_and_load();
> if (CHECK(!skel, "test_probe_read_user_str__open_and_load",
> diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/test_overhead.c b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/test_overhead.c
> index f27013e38..6161009df 100644
> --- a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/test_overhead.c
> +++ b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/test_overhead.c
> @@ -17,7 +17,7 @@ static __u64 time_get_ns(void)
>
> static int test_task_rename(const char *prog)
> {
> - int i, fd, duration = 0, err;
> + int i, fd, err;
> char buf[] = "test_overhead";
> __u64 start_time;
>
> @@ -66,7 +66,7 @@ void test_test_overhead(void)
> struct bpf_program *fentry_prog, *fexit_prog;
> struct bpf_object *obj;
> struct bpf_link *link;
> - int err, duration = 0;
> + int err;
> char comm[16] = {};
>
> if (CHECK_FAIL(prctl(PR_GET_NAME, comm, 0L, 0L, 0L)))
> diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/xdp_synproxy.c b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/xdp_synproxy.c
> index 8b50a992d..5af434353 100644
> --- a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/xdp_synproxy.c
> +++ b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/xdp_synproxy.c
> @@ -40,7 +40,6 @@ static bool expect_str(char *buf, size_t size, const char *str, const char *name
> {
> static char escbuf_expected[CMD_OUT_BUF_SIZE * 4];
> static char escbuf_actual[CMD_OUT_BUF_SIZE * 4];
> - static int duration = 0;
> bool ok;
>
> ok = size == strlen(str) && !memcmp(buf, str, size);
> --
> 2.17.1
>
>
>
>
Powered by blists - more mailing lists