[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <b72e6fe0-2ba4-47ac-80a5-94ee4101ad2b@linaro.org>
Date: Fri, 13 Oct 2023 13:46:02 +0200
From: Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski@...aro.org>
To: Michal Simek <michal.simek@....com>,
Praveen Teja Kundanala <praveen.teja.kundanala@....com>,
srinivas.kandagatla@...aro.org, robh+dt@...nel.org,
krzysztof.kozlowski+dt@...aro.org, conor+dt@...nel.org,
devicetree@...r.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/5] dt-bindings: nvmem: Convert xlnx,zynqmp-nvmem.txt to
yaml
On 13/10/2023 13:22, Michal Simek wrote:
>>
>>> +
>>> +required:
>>> + - compatible
>>
>> required: block goes after patternProperties: block
>>
>>> +
>>> +patternProperties:
>>> + "^soc_revision@0$":
>>
>> Why do you define individual memory cells? Is this part of a binding?
>> IOW, OS/Linux requires this?
>
> nvmem has in kernel interface where you can reference to nodes. nvmem_cell_get()
> calls. It means you should be able to describe internal layout that's why names
> are used. And address in name is there because of reg property is used to
> describe base offset and size.
That's not really what I am asking. Why internal layout of memory must
be part of the bindings?
Best regards,
Krzysztof
Powered by blists - more mailing lists